J S Grepe v Loambulteel v J Grepe
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1875 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
35 cases
-
Kearney v Bank of Scotland
...the proceedings are.” 123 The jurisprudence was developed further over time including by the English Court of Appeal in Grepe v. Loam (1887) 37 Ch. D. 168 which framed its order as follows: - “That the said applicants or any of them be not allowed to make any further applications in these a......
-
Nursing and Midwifery Council v Harrold; North Bristol NHS Trust v Harrold
...prevent abuse of its process. These powers were elucidated in Bhamjee v Forsdick [2003] EWCA Civ 1113; [2004] 1 WLR 88, Grepe v Loam (1887) 37 Ch D 168, Ebert v Venvil [2000] Ch 484, and Attorney General v Ebert [2001] EWHC 695 (Admin); [2002] 2 All ER 789. In Ebert, the Court of Appea......
-
Christopher Paul Reynard v Nigel Fox
...of civil restraint orders under rule 3.11 was the order first made in the Chancery Division of the High Court in Grepe v Loam (1887) 37 ChD 168. Such an order barred the litigant against whom it was directed from making any further applications in the same proceedings as were then pending w......
-
R (Kumar) v Secretary of State for Consititutional Affairs (Leave to Appeal)
...a litigant from issuing fresh applications without the leave of the court within the four corners of a single action (see Grepe v Loam (1887) 37 Ch D 168) . 53 In Ebert v Venvil [2000] Ch 484 the court made it clear, however, that it had power to impose such a restraint beyond the four corn......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...9 February 2012 69 Garratt & Co v Ewing [1991] 1 WLR 1356 34, 45 Golder v United Kingdom (1975) 1 EHRR 524 17, 18, 36 Grepe v Loam (1887) 37 ChD 168 5, 6 H v United Kingdom (1985) 45 D & R 281 17, 18, 36 Hadmar Productions Ltd v Hamilton [1983] 1 AC 191 134 Hannigan v Hannigan [2000] 2 FCR ......
-
Introduction
...dismissed, and the respondent had no need to attend the 14 In re Alexander Chaffers (1896–1897) 13 TLR 363 at 364 (CA). 15 Grepe v Loam (1887) 37 Ch D 168. 6 Vexatious Litigants and Civil Restraint Orders hearing. The order could be appealed if permission was granted. The county courts had ......
-
Civil Procedure
...of civil proceedings which are vexatious, frivolous or likely to constitute an abuse of the process of court (citing Grepe v Loam(1887) 37 Ch D 168 to this effect). The court upheld the decision of the registrar to restrain the plaintiff from continuing to make multiple applications to cour......