J Sainsbury v Broadway Malyan
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1999 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Trebor Bassett Holdings Ltd and Another v Adt Fire and Security Plc
...of them had a major effect on the damage and destruction beyond the 'oil pop' production area. b) Particular Authorities 581 In J Sainsbury PLC v Broadway Malyan [1999] PNLR.286, HHJ Humphrey Lloyd QC ruled that Sainsbury had not been contributorily negligent in failing to put in sprinkler......
-
Nationwide Building Society v Dunlop Haywards Ltd
...preclude the making of a contribution order in respect of costs. The Court did not adopt the approach of HHJ Lloyd in J Sainsbury plc v Broadway Malyan [1998] 61 Con L.R. 31. Judge Lloyd had held (obiter) that neither “compensation” within section 6 nor “damage” within section 2 (3) include......
-
Mouchel Ltd v Van Oord (UK) Ltd (Number 2)
...of decisions which have considered whether or not a party may recover a contribution to its costs under the 1978 Act. In J Sainsbury plc v Broadway Malyan (a firm) (1998) 61 Con LR 31 His Honour Judge Humphrey LLoyd QC had to consider a claim for contribution by architects against consultin......
-
Carillion Jm Ltd v Phi Group Ltd Robert West Consulting Ltd (Third Party)
...of the architects, but…I cannot interfere with the apportionment as made by the judge." 255 The case of J Sainsbury v Broadway Malyan [1999] PNLR 286 concerned the negligent design of a supermarket fire compartment wall by the architect and the consulting engineers. The architect settled th......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
How Will The Courts Make A Just And Equitable Apportionment Of Damages Under The Civil Liability (Contribution) Act?
...the work. The apportionment was held to be 60/40 as between the builder and architect: The case of J Sainsbury v Broadway Malyan, [1999] PNLR 286, was also considered which concerned the negligent design of a supermarket fire compartment wall by the architect and the consulting engineers. H......
3 books & journal articles
-
Dispute resolution
...[41] and [50]; Anwar Patrick Adrian v Ng Chong & Hue LLC [2014] SGCA 34 at [202(c)(i)]. Compare J Sainsbury plc v Broadway Malyan (1998) 61 Con LR 31 at 63 [5.17], per HHJ LLoyd QC. 279 German Property 50 SARL v Summers-Inman Construction & Property Consultants LLP [2010] BLR 179 at 182 [19......
-
Defects
...hiess Pty Ltd v Parsons Brinckerhof Australia Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 173 at [173], per McDougall J. 75 J Sainsbury plc v Broadway Malyan (1998) 61 Con Lr 31 at 52–53 [4.5], per hhJ LLoyd QC. as to the duty of a consultant to review his design, see Chapter 15. 76 Hill Samuel Bank Ltd v Frederi......
-
Statutory regulation of work
...grounds: [2014] EWCA Civ 714). 88 Worlock v SAWS (1982) 22 BLR 66 at 78, per Robert Gof LJ; J Sainsbury plc v Broadway Malyan (1998) 61 Con LR 31 at 45 [2.19], per HHJ LLoyd QC. 89 Sunley Homes v Borg [1970] 1 QB 115 at 120–121, per Lord Parker CJ. See also Salt v Scott Hall [1903] 2 KB 245......