J v DLA Piper UK LLP

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Neutral Citation[2010] UKEAT 0263_09_1506,UKEAT/263/09
Year2010
Date2010
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
231 cases
  • Ms A Lacatus v Barclays Execution Services Ltd and others: 3201295/2019 and 3201137/2020
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 7 September 2021
    ...effects of a mainly physical nature may stem from an underlying mental impairment, and vice versa.’ 465. In J v DLA Piper UK LLP 2010 ICR 1052, EAT the claimant argued that, if she could establish that there was a substantial adverse effect on her abilities to undertake ordinary day to day ......
  • Mr M Gaskell v Ministry of Justice: 1802032/2022 and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 24 May 2022
    ...effect resulting from a different impairment would not properly be described as a recurrence. 82. In the case of J v DLA Piper UK LLP 2010 ICR 1052 the EAT said when considering the question of impairment in cases of alleged depression, tribunals should be aware of the distinction between c......
  • Ms A Iunes v Marks and Spencer plc: 2201980/2018
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 4 January 2019
    ...v Dudley Metropolitan Council 2017 ICR 610 (Richardson J) the EAT, taking account of the decision of the EAT in J v DLA Piper UK LLP 2010 ICR 1052 said that there is a distinction between a mental impairment and a reaction to life events. Herry was a case in which one of the conditions reli......
  • McClean vs Simon Community,Jim Dennison
    • United Kingdom
    • Industrial Tribunal (NI)
    • 17 June 2020
    ...treated as substantial. There is therefore little room for any form of sliding scale between one and the other.” 9.6 In J v DLA Piper UK [2010] ICR 1052, the Employment Appeal Tribunal stated:- “40. … (1) It remains good practice in every case for a tribunal to state conclusions separately ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
1 books & journal articles
  • ‘All About That Bass’? Is non‐ideal‐weight discrimination unlawful in the UK?
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 79-2, March 2016
    • 1 March 2016
    ...that from its understanding of non-idealweight, it may constitute an impairment under the Act.28 [2006] IRLR 112.29 ibid at [22].30 [2010] IRLR 936.31 UKEAT/0097/12 at [18]. For an extended discussion of the Walk e r ruling, reaching a differentoverall conclusion to ours, see S. W. Flint an......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT