J19 v Facebook Ireland Limited

JurisdictionNorthern Ireland
JudgeColton J
Judgment Date28 April 2017
Neutral Citation[2017] NIQB 42
Date28 April 2017
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
1
Neutral Citation: [2017] NIQB 42
Ref:
COL10283
Judgment: approved by the Court for handing down
Delivered:
28/4/2017
(subject to editorial corrections)*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND
_________
QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION
________
2013 No. 97460
BETWEEN:
J19
Plaintiff;
-and-
FACEBOOK IRELAND LIMITED
Defendant.
_________
COLTON J
Background
[1] In this action the plaintiff seeks damages against the defendant for breach of
privacy and misuse of private information arising from the posting of various
photographs, information and comments on Facebook webpages in September 2013.
[2] The action was listed for hearing along with another similar action namely J20
v Facebook Ireland Limited on 15 March 2016. The J20 action arose from similar
postings at the same time and gave rise to the same legal issues as those that arose in
this action.
[3] This action was opened by Mr David McMillen QC on behalf of the plaintiff
in the course of which he indicated to me, the trial judge, that the plaintiff had
suffered a panic attack, had gone home and would not be in a position to give
evidence.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Gerard Kelly and Malachi O’Doherty
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
    • January 8, 2024
    ...be a last resort as it will deprive a plaintiff of a substantive right (see Lord Clarke in Summers at [49]). Colton J in J19 v Facebook [2017] NIQB 42 at [36] summarised the position as follows: “It is clear that this power should only be exercised in very clear and obvious cases when one i......
  • AB and Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent and Belfast Health & Social Care Trust
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
    • May 6, 2021
    ...be a last resort as it will deprive a plaintiff of a substantive right (see Lord Clarke in Summers at [49]). Colton J in J19 v Facebook [2017] NIQB 42 at [36] summarised the position as follows: “It is clear that this power should only be exercised in very clear and obvious cases when one i......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Compensation events under NEC3: Prospective vs Retrospective Assessment
    • Ireland
    • JD Supra Ireland
    • May 26, 2017
    ...known? This controversial issue was considered in the case of Northern Ireland Housing Executive v Healthy Buildings (Ireland) Limited [2017] NIQB 42.In that The contracting parties using the NEC3 form became embroiled in a dispute as to the assessment of a compensation event. The employer ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT