Jackson v Barrow
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1626 |
| Date | 01 January 1626 |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
English Reports Citation: 21 E.R. 774
LORD COVENTRY.
Jackson
and
Barrow
jackson versus barrow. Lord Coventry, Pasch. 2 Car. 1 [1626]. The Plaintiff being an Assignee of an Extent, exhibited his Bill against the Defendant who was Tenant of the Lands, to enforce him to attorn Tenant to him, and to pay the Arrears of Rent which were in his Hands, and to deliver unto him a true Note m Writing of the Date of the Deed, and for what Term of Years he had it in Lease, and under what Rent reserved, but not any of the Covenants or Conditions contained therein. As to the Arrears of Rent, the Court desired to see Precedents before the Decree was made, and thereupon a Precedent was [3] produced in point between Shute and Mallery, 5 Jac. 1...
To continue reading
Request your trial
37 cases
-
Crofts v Middleton
...the property, and that he did (1) Mr. E. F. Smith 'subsequently handed up the cases of Owens v. DicJcenson, Cr. & Ph. 48 ; Stead v. Nelson, 2 Beav. 245 ; and Dwell v. Dew, 1 Y. & C. C. 345 ; and the Vice-Chaneellor in the course of the week intimated that these authorities did not induce hi......
-
The Same v Bateman
...in safety between the offer to abandon and the action brought, the assured cannot proceed as for a total loss. 10 East, 329, Bainbridge v. Nelson. 2 M. & S. 240, Andersm v. JPallis. Ibid. 290, Falkner v. Ritchie. 2 Taunt. 363, Parsons v. Scott. 5 M. & S. 419, Brotherston v. Barber. [9 B. & ......
-
The Mayor and Burgesses of Lyme Regis, - Plaintiffs (in Error); Henry Hoste Henley, Esq., - Defendant (in Error)
...however necessary; or, at all events, not until the corporation had been called upon, and neglected to do them; The Earl of Lonsdale v. Nelson (2 B. and C. 302; S.C. 3 Dowl. and K. 556); and it is doubtful whether he would be justified even then, the proper remedy being, as there stated, by......
-
Hughes v Wells
...which had taken place,, they cited Pollard v. Green-mi (1 Chan. Gas. 10; Rep. Ch. 185; Sugd. Pow. vol. 2, p. 96, 7th edit.), Stead v. Nelson (2 Beav. 245), Nail v. Punter (5 Sim. 555), Pawlet v. [761] Delaval (2 Ves. 663), Catm v. Rideout (1 Mac. & G-. 599), Beresford v. The Archbishop of A......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Action Plan to Implement the New Dodd-Frank Preemption Rules
...banks will have to adhere to more limited preemption of state laws in accordance with the 1996 Supreme Court holding in Barnett Bank v. Nelson.2 With less than 10 months before the new preemption rules become effective, national banks and federal savings banks must immediately begin work im......
-
Antitrust Bulletin - Vol. 5, No. 1
...Printing Co. v. Kimberly Clark Corp.2 Under Ninth Circuit Clarifies Scope of the “Direct Purchaser” Rule in Federal Antitrust ClaimsLaura E. Nelson2Royal Printing and its progeny, the Ninth Circuit has held that where the direct purchaser is under the control of a co-conspirator, such as a ......
7 books & journal articles
-
Illegality, Resulting Trusts and Twin Presumptions: Antiquated Law Meets Modern Society
...the courts will act contrary to breathing life into this problematic distinction by emulating the modern judicial attitude demonstrated in Nelson. 2 The Discriminatory Element The discriminatory element of the law in this area has led to the opinion that presumptions are no longer desirable......
-
On the origins of consorting laws.
...(Auckland), 15 July 1856, 2; The Daily Southern Cross (Auckland), 19 January 1865, 5-6; The Nelson Examiner and New Zealand Chronicle (Nelson), 2 December 1857, 2-3; The Nelson Examiner and New Zealand Chronicle (Nelson), 26 October 1865, 2; The Otago Daily Times (Dunedin), 14 January 1864,......
-
Individual Scrutiny or Politics as Usual? Senatorial Assessment of U.S. District Court Nominees
...DOI: 10.1177/1532673X13513032 apr.sagepub.com Senatorial Assessment of U.S. District Court Nominees Logan Dancey1, Kjersten R. Nelson2, and Eve M. AbstractSenate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearings offer senators a public opportunity to exercise their “advice and consent” privilege an......
-
Now & then.
...2 Golden Corral Corp. Theodore M. Fowler Jr. 6,100 3 Klaussner Furniture J.B. Davis 7,400 Industries Inc. 4 National Gypsum Co. Thomas C. Nelson 2,700 5 Parkdale Mills Inc. Anderson D. Warlick 3,588 $250 MILLION TO $499 MILLION 6 Goldsboro Milling Co. J. Louis Maxwell Jr. 2,169 7 J.T. Daven......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 provisions
-
Local Government Board's Provisional Orders Confirmation (No.7) Act 1897
...divisions. Art. XXL(1.) The added area shall cease to form part of the Township of BrierMd and shall be amalgamated with the Township of Nelson. (2.) The persons who at the commencement of this Order are the Guardians of the Poor of the Burnley Union representing the Township of Nelson shal......
-
Ministry of Health Provisional Orders Confirmation (No.8) Act 1925
...Public roads Southport Cor- Kenneth Peck Jones 2 West except Back poration and J. G. Ripley Street' ; Coronation Scarisbrick Magee Marshall Nelson 2 West Walk. Trustees and Company Street Magee Marshall Stephen Had- Todd 2 West | and Company E. W. Ball M. A. Ball-Thomas Johnson Daniel Perci......
-
Chapter 159, SB 1660 – Relating to the creation of the Travis-Creedmoor Municipal Utility District; providing authority to impose taxes and issue bonds; granting the power of eminent domain.
...and PLACE OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; THENCE with the Easterly right-of-way line of Carl Road and the Westerly line of said Nelson (2.50 acre) tract, N 29 deg. 43' 51" E 299.97 ft. to a " iron rod found at the Northwest corner of said Nelson (2.50 acre) tract and being the N......