De Jager v Attorney General of Natal
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1907 |
| Year | 1907 |
| Date | 1907 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Hewitt v Rivers
...High Ct. of Australia, August 23rd, 1950, unreported; noted at (1977), 51 ALJ 171, distinguished. (10) De Jager v. Att.-Gen. (Natal), [1907] A.C. 326; [1907] UKPC 24, followed. (11) Eichmann v. Att. Gen., Israel Supreme Ct., May 29th, 1962, unreported, referred to. (12) Haig v. AgeeUNK(1981......
-
Madzimbamuto v Lardner-Burke
...for the applicants rightly pointed out, is contrary to the opinion of the Privy Council in De Jager v. Attorney General of NatalELR (1907) A.C. 326, which is binding on this Court. To that extent, therefore, what Coccejus says is of no weight. In other respects, however, he follows substant......
- 1 R v Lasalle and Shah; 2 Lai Leung and Noray v R; 3 Guy v R
-
Love v Commonwealth of Australia and Thoms v Commonwealth of Australia
...at 92–93 per Judge Moore. 322 McMahon (1866) 26 UCR 195 at 200–201 per Draper CJ for the Court; cf De Jager v Attorney-General of Natal [1907] AC 326 at 328 per Lord Loreburn LC for the Board; Carlisle (1872) 83 US 147 at 154–155 per Field J for the Court. See Joyce v Director of Public Pro......
Request a trial to view additional results