Jagger v Jagger
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1926 |
| Year | 1926 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner
...to a person being prosecuted or sued simply to provide security or compensation or punishment or satisfaction of a judgment. In Jagger v. Jagger (1926 P 93, 102) Lord Justice Scrutton said: "I am not aware of any statutory or other power in the court to restrain a person from dealing with ......
- Scott v Scott
-
Faith Panton Property Plan Ltd v Hodgetts
...only granted where the sum due was a liquidated sum which had been ordered by the court. See, for example, Newton v. Newton 11 P.D. 11, Jagger v. Jagger (1926) P. 23, Scott v. Scott (1951) P. 193 and a number of other cases. These cases are no longer good law because as Lord Justice Brandon......
-
British Railways Board v Herrington
...said: 'When you invite a person into your house to use the staircase you do not invite him to slide down the bannisters'. The Calgarth [1926] P. 93, 110. So far as he sets foot on so much of the premises as lie outside the invitation or uses them for purposes which are alien to the invitati......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The Emotional Dynamics of Consent
...R 47.33. Contrary to s. 9(1)(b) of the Theft Act 1968.34. (1976) 63 Cr App R 47 at 50.35. Ibid. at 51, citing Scrutton LJ in The Calgarth [1926] P 93 at 110: ‘When you invite a person into your house to use thestaircase you do not invite him to slide down the banisters.’36. See for instance......