Jagger v Jagger
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 1926 |
| Year | 1926 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
11 cases
-
Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner
...being prosecuted or sued simply to provide security or compensation or punishment or satisfaction of a judgment. In Jagger v. Jagger (1926 P 93, 102) Lord Justice Scrutton said: "I am not aware of any statutory or other power in the court to restrain a person from dealing with his property ......
-
Scott v Scott
... ... Newton v. Newton (1885) 11 P. D. 11; Burmester v. Burmester [1913] P. 76; Jagger v. Jagger [1926] P. 93, applied ... APPEAL from Wallington, J ... The applicant and her husband were married in August, 1930. In September, 1950, ... ...
-
Faith Panton Property Plan Ltd v Hodgetts
...only granted where the sum due was a liquidated sum which had been ordered by the court. See, for example, Newton v. Newton 11 P.D. 11, Jagger v. Jagger (1926) P. 23, Scott v. Scott (1951) P. 193 and a number of other cases. These cases are no longer good law because as Lord Justice Brandon......
-
British Railways Board v Herrington
...said: 'When you invite a person into your house to use the staircase you do not invite him to slide down the bannisters'. The Calgarth [1926] P. 93, 110. So far as he sets foot on so much of the premises as lie outside the invitation or uses them for purposes which are alien to the invitati......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
The Emotional Dynamics of Consent
...R 47.33. Contrary to s. 9(1)(b) of the Theft Act 1968.34. (1976) 63 Cr App R 47 at 50.35. Ibid. at 51, citing Scrutton LJ in The Calgarth [1926] P 93 at 110: ‘When you invite a person into your house to use thestaircase you do not invite him to slide down the banisters.’36. See for instance......
