James Hitchins, Appellant, Thomas Brown, Respondent

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date20 November 1845
Date20 November 1845
CourtCourt of Common Pleas

English Reports Citation: 135 E.R. 849

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.

James Hitchins, Appellant, Thomas Brown
Respondent.

S. C. 15 L. J. C. P. 38; 9 Jur. 1058. Followed, Ford v. Boon, 1871, L. R. 7 C. P. 155. Discussed, Bendle v. Watson, 1871, L. R. 7 C. P. 168; Soutter v. Roderick, [1896] 1 Q. B. 94.

C. B. 25. HITCHINS V. BROWN 849 [25] city of lincoln. james hitchins, Appellant, thomas brown, Respondent. Nov. 20,1845. [S. C. 15 L. J. C. P. 38; 9 Jur. 1058. Followed, Ford v. Bom, 1871, L. R. 7 C. P. 155. Discussed, Bendle v. IFatson, 1871, L. R. 7 C. P. 168; Sautter v. Roderick, [1896] 1 Q. B. 94.] In a notice of claim to be inserted in a list of voters for a city or borough, pursuant to the 6 & 7 Viet. c. 18, s. 15, sched. (B) No. 6, it is enough to describe the nature of the qualification in the third column of the form'as "house," notwithstanding the qualification in reality consists in the occupation of two houses in immediate succession, provided the whole qualification is accurately described in the fourth column.-And semble, that, at all events, the misdescription, if any, is amendable under s. 40. William Upton appeared to have given due notice of his claim to have his name inserted in the list of persons entitled to vote in respect of property occupied within the parish of St. Peter-at-Arches. The notice of his claim was as follows :- " Notice of claim. " To the overseers of the parish of St. Peter-at-Arches, in the city of Lincoln. " I hereby give you notice that I claim to have my name inserted in the list made by you of persons entitled to vote in the election of members for the city of Lincoln; and that the particulars of my qualification and place of abode are stated in the columns below. Dated the 23rd day of August, 1845 :- Christian Xame and Surname of the claimant, at full length. Place of Abode. Nature of Qualification. Street, Lane, &c., where the Property is situate, &;., wherelthe Right depends on Property. William Upton. Muck Lane, House. No. 5|, Muck Lane, Saint Peter- Saint Peter - at - at - Arches, Arches, Lincoln ; Lincoln. and previously in the occupation of a house No. 21, Saint Mary Street, in the parish of Saint Mary le Wigford, Lincoln. William Upton." He proved that he had occupied the two houses described in the fourth column of his claim, in immediate succession, and had done all the things required by law to entitle him to have his name inserted. The insertion of his name was duly objected to by James Hitchins, a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Henry Onion, Appellant, John Bowdler, Respondent
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Common Pleas
    • 18 November 1847
    ...not supplied to the barrister's satisfaction, I see no ground for finding fault with his decision." In Hitchins, App., Brown, [68] Eesp. (2 C. B. 25, 1 Lutw. Eeg. Cas. 328), the list was held to have been properly amended, by altering the description of the qualification from "house" to "ho......
  • Howitt v Stephens
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Common Pleas
    • 16 November 1858
    ...264. The different uses of the third and fourth columns in the schedules are [34] pointed out by the court in Hitching, App., Brown, Reap., 2 C. B. 25, I Lutw. Keg. Oas. 328,-the fourth being an exposition or more particular description of the qualification the nature of which is stated gen......
  • Origin Energy Limited v Commissioner of Taxation
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 4 September 2019
    ...1 of the Court Book at Tab 14; pages 169-171 (1CB14 (pages 169-171); 1CB17 (pages 191-193); 1CB21 (pages 284-300); 1CB22 (pages 301-303); 2CB25 (pages 2302-2338); 3CB24 (pages 2296-2301); 3CB33 (pages 2900-2903); and paragraphs 3.1 to 3.5, paragraphs 3.25, 3.36, 3.37, 3.39, 3.47 and 4.19(e)......
  • Dempsey Appellant v Keegan Respondent
    • Ireland
    • Chancery Division (Ireland)
    • 16 November 1885
    ...65. Onions v. BowdlerENR 5 C. B,65, 73. Ford v. HoarELR 14 Q. B. Div. 510. Kelleher v. TarrantUNKIR I. R. 3 C. L. 130. Hitchins v. BrownENR 2 C. B. 25. Bardle v. WatsonELR L. R. 7 C. P. 162; 1 Hop. and Colt 591, 603. Bartlett v. GibbsUNK 5 M. & G. 81. Foskett v. KaufmanELR 16 Q. B. Div. 279......
1 provisions
  • National Health Service (Scotland) Act 1978
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 1 January 1978
    ...(Reimbursement of the Cost of EEA Treatment) (Scotland) Regulations 2010 (S.S.I. 2010/283), reg. 3(2) F817 S. 2CB: s. 2CA renumbered as s. 2CB (25.10.2013) by The National Health Service (Cross-Border Health Care) (Scotland) Regulations 2013 (S.S.I. 2013/292), regs. 1(1), 2CB: Functions of ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT