James Joseph Hamill v HM Advocate
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Neutral Citation | 1999 SCCR 384 |
| Year | 1999 |
| Date | 1999 |
| Court | Unspecified Court (Scotland) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Johnston v HM Advocate [Appeal Court, High Court of Justiciary]
...Docherty 1980 SLT (Notes) 33 Dickson v HM AdvocateUNK [2005] HCJAC 39; 2005 SCCR 344 Hamill v HM AdvocateSCUNK 1999 JC 190; 1999 SLT 963; 1999 SCCR 384 R v Blake and TyeENRENRUNK (1844) 6 QB 126; 115 ER 49; 13 LJMC 131; 8 Jur 666 Textbooks etc. referred to: Dickson, WG, A Treatise on the La......
-
William Johnston V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...from Dickson has been cited in a number of Scottish cases, such as HM Advocate v Docherty 1980 SLT (Notes) 33 and Hamill v HM Advocate 1999 SCCR 384, the rationale and scope of the common enterprise exception do not appear to have received as detailed consideration in Scotland as in a numbe......
-
Alan Hughes V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...man who was coming. It was accepted that statements by a co‑accused are admissible against another in a case of concert - Hammill v HMA 1999 SCCR 384. However, the circumstances of that case were different from the present case - in Hammill, there was a sufficient body of evidence, leaving ......
- Hughes v Hm Advocate
1 books & journal articles
-
Organised Crime and the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010
...of that conspiracy or concert, whether it takes the form of actings or of actings in association with statements.9393Hamill v HM Advocate 1999 SCCR 384. Renton and Brown highlight a straightforward example of this exception in a case of fraud where false statements are made by one of the co......