James v Commonwealth of Australia (No. 2)
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 1936 |
| Year | 1936 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
55 cases
-
Steadroy C. O. Benjamin Appellant v [1] The Commissoner of Police [2] Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda Respondents [ECSC]
... ... Grenada v The Grenada Bar Association Grenada Civil Appeal No. 8 of 1999 (delivered 21st February 2000) followed; Reyes v The Queen ... 14 In Frederick Alexander James v Commonwealth of Australia and the State of New South Wales and Others , ... ...
- Public Prosecutor v OLadotun Lukmaru Umaru
- Tan Tek Seng v Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Pendidikan and Another
- The Speaker of Dewan Undangan Negeri of Sarawak Datuk Amar Mohamad Asfia Awang Nassar v Ting Tiong Choon and Others and Other Appeals
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
The Citizenship Battle Between Malaysian Mothers And The Government Of Malaysia Commentary On Suriani Kempe V. Kerajaan Malaysia
...Ors [1976] 2 MLJ 116 ... that the Constitution is not to be construed in any narrow or pedantic sense (James v Commonwealth of Australia [1936] AC 578) ... but this does not mean that a court is at liberty to stretch or pervert the language of the Constitution in the interests of any legal ......
5 books & journal articles
-
ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF HARD STATE BORDER CLOSURES IN RESPONSE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.
...of New South Wales v Commonwealth (Bank Nationalisation case) (1948) 76 CLR 1 (Austl.). (395) Id. at 293. (396) James v. Commonwealth (1936) AC 578; James v Commonwealth (1936) 55 CLR 1 (397) Gratwick v Johnson (1945) 70 CLR 1 (Austl.). (398) Gratwick v Johnson (1950) AC 235; Gratwick v Joh......
-
2010 index
...Police [2004] UKHL 3.9 .................................................................. 112-115James v Commonwealth of Australia [1936] AC 578 ................................... 340Minister of Home Affairs (Bermuda) and Another v Fisher and An-other 1980 AC 319 ...............................
-
Chapter VIII. Decisions of National Tribunals
...to enlarge constructively those conditions and restrictions.” This passage was quoted with approval in James v Commonwealth of Australia 1936 AC 578 at 613-614, and if restrictions on the plenary powers of a Legislature are not constructively to be enlarged, then a fortiori in a case where ......
-
On francis bacon and 'doing' jurisprudence
...rticu* r*y cf. B cons tre tment of the word moist’ with Lord Wright MRs tre tment of the word ‘free’ in James v Commonwealth of Australia [ 1936] AC 578, 627 quoted r 29: “’Free’ in itse*f is v gue nd indetermin te. It must t ke its co*our from the context. Comp re, for inst nce, its use tn......
Get Started for Free
