James v Preseli Prembrokeshire District Council
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1993 |
Year | 1993 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
-
Devon CC v TR
...road." 12 Lord Faulks' submission is, as it was at trial, that the facts as found by the judge were analogous to the position in James v Preseli Pembrokeshire DC [1993] PIQR P114. That was a tripping case in which there was evidence that an extensive paved area was generally in poor conditi......
-
Demetrios Karpasitis v Hertfordshire County Council
...where the Claimant fell was dangerous, not whether the pavement as a whole was in a poor condition: James v Preseli Pembrokeshire DC [1993] PIQR P114. 21 The obligation of maintenance does not extend to prevent the formation of ice or remove the accumulation of snow on the road: Goodes (sup......
-
Jones v Rhondda cynon taff cbc
...12 Foreseeability of harm will not of itself entail the conclusion that the highway is unsafe. As Lloyd LJ said in James v Preseli Pembrokeshire District Council [1993] PIQR 114 at 119: “In one sense it is reasonably foreseeable that any defect in the highway, however slight, may cause an i......
-
Dean and Chapter of Rochester Cathedral v Mr Leonard Debell
...is more than fanciful and yet does not attract liability if the danger is not eliminated. The observations of Lloyd LJ in James v Preseli Pembrokeshire District Council [1993] P.I.Q.R. P114, a case which applied the test in Mills, are pertinent: "In one sense, it is reasonably foreseeable t......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...[1975] 1 WLR 1468, [1975] 3 All ER 92, 119 SJ 759, CA 2.16–2.18, 2.20, 7.29, 7.30, 7.34 James v Preseli Pembrokeshire District Council [1993] PIQR P114, [1992] 10 WLUK 343, CA 5.23 James v Travelsphere Limited, 2 February 2005 (unreported), Cardiff Cty Ct 5.197–5.199 Japp v Virgin Holidays ......