Jamil bin Harun v Yang Kamsiah Bte. Meor Rasdi

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1984
Date1984
Year1984
CourtPrivy Council

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Peh Diana and Another v Tan Miang Lee
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 3 January 1991
    ... ... (d) Tominam bte Tukimin v Toh Kai Chup [1985] 2 MLJ 345 ... (f) Jamil bin Harun v Yang Kamsiah & Anor [1984] 1 ... ...
  • Lai Wee Lian v Singapore Bus Service
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 10 April 1984
    ... ... Area Health Authority [1980] AC 174 and Jamil bin Harun v Yang Kamsiah [1984] 1 MLJ 217 ... ...
  • Iqbal v Whipps Cross University NHS Trust
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 November 2007
    ...Jamil Bin Harun v Yang Kamsia 1984 1 AC 529 as support for his argument that Croke v Wiseman supports his interpretation of Pickett. In Jamil Bin Harun, a decision of the Privy Council, Lord Scarman, giving the judgment of the court, approved remarks in the judgment of Griffiths LJ in Croke......
  • Akeem Morgan v Owen Porter
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 20 December 2012
    ...[1990] JLR 134; Jamaica Telephone Co. Ltd. v Delmar Dixon (bnf Olive Maxwell) SCCA 15/91 (July 6, 1994), Jamil bin Harun v Yang Kamsiah [1984] AC 529 [1984] AC 529 (PC) and the Monex case. 148 It is useful to highlight the passages from theMonex case referred to by the Claimant in his submi......
  • Get Started for Free