Jebsen v East and West India Dock Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1865 |
| Year | 1865 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
- Levison v Farin
-
Allianz Global Investors GmbH and Others v Barclays Bank Plc
... ... (6) JP Morgan Chase & Co (7) Nat West Markets Plc (8) UBS AG ... fund, whether structured as a trust, a company or a partnership. To the extent that an investor ... Co. L.R 10 Ex 1 ... 3 Jebsen v East and West India Dock Co. L.R. 10 C.P.300 ... ...
-
Fulton Shipping Inc. of Panama v Globalia Business Travel SAU (formerly Travelplan SAU) of Spain: The New Flamenco
...damages ought not to be reduced by reason of the same persons taking passage on another vessel belonging to the plaintiffs: Jebsen v East and West India Dock Co. (1874) LR 10 CP 300, a case in which what was relied on as mitigation did not arise out of the transactions the subject-matter of......
-
Kaines (U.K.) Ltd v Osterreichische Warrenhandelsgesellschaft (formerly C.G.L. Handelsgesellschaft m.b.H.)
...v. Whyte (1838) 4 Bing. N.C. 272; Bradburn v. Great Western Railway (1874) L.R. 10 Ex. 1; Jebsen v. East and West India Dock Co. (1875) L.R. 10 C.P. 300." 15I find further support for the judge's approach in the reasoned analysis of Mr Justice Robert Goff in The Elena d'Amico (supra) at pag......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Claims for the value of the lost contractual performance
...is made by Stevens, ‘Damages and the Right to Performance’ above n 6 at 181. 128[1916] 1 AC 175. 129[1954] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 65. 130(1875) LR 10 CP 300. In British Westinghouse, Viscount Haldane attempted to distinguish Jebsen on the (spurious) basis that the benefit ‘did not arise out of the t......