Jeffery v Smith

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1970
Year1970
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Hay v Hughes
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 October 1974
    ...children, the cost of employing her would be recoverable from the defendant ( as in Berry -v- Humm 1915 1 K.B. 627 and Jeffrey -v- Smith 1970 R.T.R. 279) and, furthermore, that the salary of £15 a week claimed by the plaintiffs and adopted by the learned trial Judge as the estimated cost of......
  • Bordin and another v St Mary's NHS Trust
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Bordin and Another v St. Mary's Nhs Trust
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 26 January 2000
    ...the cost of employment her would be recoverable from the defendant (as in Berry v. Humm & Co. [1915] 1 K.B. 627 and Jeffrey v. Smith [1970] R.T.R. 279) and, furthermore, that the salary of £15 a week claimed by the plaintiffs and adopted by Reeve J. as the estimated cost of obtaining her se......
  • Hurt v Murphy
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • What does it mean to suffer loss? Haxton v Philips Electronics
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 77-6, November 2014
    • 1 November 2014
    ...referring to Skelton vCollins(1965–66) 39 ALJR 480.67 I use the term ‘reasons’ in a looser sense than Gardner, however.68 Jeffrey vSmith [1970] RTR 279.69 Mehmet vPerry [1977] 2 All ER 529.70 Donnelly vJoyce [1974] 1 QB 454; Cunningham vHarrison [1973] 3 WLR 97.71 Donnelly vJoyce ibid, 462B......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT