Jenny v Herle

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1795
Date01 January 1795
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 93 E.R. 719

COURTS OF CHANCERY, KING'S BENCH, COMMON PLEAS AND EXCHEQUER

Jenny
and
ers. Herle

jenny vers. herle. Pas. 9 Geo. Rot. 144. A bill drawn payable out of a particular fund is not a bill of exchange. L. Raym. 1361. 8 Mod. 265, S. C. Error of a judgment in C. B. in an action upon the case, wherein the plaintiff declares, that the defendants, according to the custom of merchants, drew a bill of exchange upon J. P. whereby they requested him to pay the plaintiff 19451. out of the monies in his the said J. P.'s hands belonging to the proprietors of the Devonshire mines, being part of the consideration money for the purchase of the manor of West Buckland, That J. P. refused to accept it, and the defendants as drawers are liable. There was judgment in C. B. for the plaintiff, but upon error in B. R. that judgment was reversed, the whole Court being of opinion, that this appointment to pay out of a particular fund, which might or might not answer, was not a bill of exchange, and exactly like the case of Jocelyn v. Laserre in B. R. Pas. 1 Geo. which was a bill drawn by an officer, upon his agent, requesting him to pay out of his growing subsistence; which the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Diplock v Hammond
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 31 May 1854
    ...Fairbank v. Bell (1 B. & A. 36); Jones v. Simpson (2 B. & C. 318); Lestrange v. Lestrange (13 Beav. 281); Jenny v. Herle (2 Ld. Raym. 1361; 1 Str. 591); Haydock v. Lynch (2 Ld. Raym. 1563). [THE lord justice knight bruce referred to Evans v. Prothero (1 De G. Mac. & G. 572).] Mr. Malins, Mr......
  • White v Ledwick, Widow, Administratrix of Ledwick
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the King's Bench
    • Invalid date
    ...in the usage. Judgment for the plaintiff (m). (/) B. R., E. 1 W. & M., 1 Show. 4. (g) B. R., T. 10 Geo. 1, 8 Mod. 265; 2 Ld. Raym. 1361; 1 Str. 591; called in Ld. Raym. and Str. Jenny v. Hale. (h) Those do not seem to be the words of the Court; 8 Mod. 267. (i) B. R., T. 4 Geo. 3, 3 Burr. 15......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT