Jervis v Harris
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 09 November 1995 |
| Date | 09 November 1995 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
48 cases
-
Fujitsu Services Ltd v IBM United Kingdom Ltd
...business, goodwill). A debt is not such a loss. The distinction between a claim for damages and a claim for debt is explained clearly in Jervis v Harris [1996] Ch 195 at 202 F-H : " The law of contract draws a clear distinction between a claim for payment of a debt and a claim for damages f......
- Ng Chin Tai, Trading in the Name and Style of Lean Seh Fishery and Another v Ananda Kumar Krishnan
-
Ulster Bank Ireland Ltd, Paul McCann and Patrick Dillon v Brian McDonagh, Kenneth McDonagh and Maurice McDonagh
.... The distinction between a claim for debt and a claim for recovery of damages was explained in precisely these terms by Millett LJ. in Jervis v. Harris [1996] 1 All ER 303, at p. 307 as follows: ‘ The law of contract draws a clear distinction between a claim for payment of a debt and a cl......
-
Decision Nº LC-2022-0000. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 26-08-2022
...with, would entitle the landlord to go on to the site and undertake the works itself, recouping the cost from the tenant (Jervis v Harris [1996] Ch 195). The new right would not apply to the tenant’s “apparatus”, an expression defined by reference to paragraph 5 of the Code, which includes ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Dilapidations Claims - A New Regime?
...If the lease includes a "self-help" clause the landlord is entitled to carry out the work and recover the costs (see Jervis v. Harris [1996] 1 EGLR 78) - costs of the repairs is a debt due under the lease; not a claim for damages under the Act. Because the tenant knows that this remedy can ......
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...All ER 189, [1995] 1 EGLR 146, CA 52, 184 Table of Cases xvii Jay v Jay [1924] 1 KB 826, 93 LJKB 280, 130 LT 667, KBD 68 Jervis v Harris [1996] Ch 195, [1996] 2 WLR 220, [1996] 1 All ER 303, CA 51 Jeune v Queen’s Cross Properties Ltd [1974] Ch 97, [1973] 3 WLR 378, [1973] 3 All ER 97, ChD 1......
-
Clark v. Macourt: defective sperm and performance substitutes in the High Court of Australia.
...Reclassified (Oxford University Press, 2005) 67. (92) For recent, unequivocal judicial support for this proposition, see Jervis v Harris [1996] Ch 195, 202 (Millett (93) Ibid 202. (94) The development of the action in 'assumpsit' out of 'trespass on the case' is traced in J H Baker, An Intr......
-
Right of Re-entry
...The tenant also argued that he was being harassed by enforcement of the repairing covenant when there was no injury to the interest of 12 [1996] Ch 195. 52 Positive Covenants and Freehold Land the person entering – in that case the landlord. The Court of Appeal saw no objection to the landl......