Job v Job
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1876 |
| Year | 1876 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 cases
- Che Nuteh Rayfeyah bte Abdul Karim v Ghows Khan bin Ibrahim Khan as the legal representative of Ibrahim Khan bin Gaffor Khan, deceased & Wan Mohamed Noor bin Wan Ahmad Nasir as the legal representative of Wan Ahmad Nasir bin Ngah Ibrahim, deceased; the estate and effects of Wan Ahmad Nasir bin Ngah Ibrahim, deceased
-
Santander UK Plc v R.A. Legal Solicitors (A Firm)
...in the value of the securities upon which the trust funds have been rightfully invested." This principle goes back, as Jessel MR stated in Job v Job, (1877) 6 Ch D 562, to what Lord Hardwicke said in Jones v Lewis, (1751) 2 Ves Sen 240 about the liability of a trustee who is robbed of the t......
-
Tang Tak Sum And Another v Tang Kai Fong
...2 All ER 858 at 963 (Slade J, as he then was); Re Stevens [1898] 1 Ch 162 at 170 (Lindley MR, as he then was). [4] Citing Job v Job (1877) 6 Ch D 562 at 564-565 (Sir George Jessel MR); Mayer v Murray (1878) 8 Ch D 424 at 426-427 (Sir George Jessel MR); Re Symons (1882) 21 Ch D 757 at 761 (F......
-
Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa and Others
...wilful default is charged and proved, accounts and inquiries on that footing may be directed at any stage of the proceedings: Job v Job (1877) 6 Ch D 562; Mayer v Murray (1878) 8 Ch D 424. In the case of In re Symons [1882] 21 Ch D 757 (“the Symons case”), which also concerned the administr......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
AN ACCOUNT OF ACCOUNTS
...1920) at p 147; Re Tebbs[1976] 1 WLR 924; [1976] 2 All ER 858; Meehan v Glazier Holdings Pty Ltd[2002] NSWCA 22 at [14]. 19Job v Job(1877) 6 Ch D 562. 20Re Stevens; Cooke v Stevens[1897] 1 Ch 422 at 432–433, per North J. 21Vernon v Vaudrey(1740) 2 Atk 119; (1740) 26 ER 474. If there has bee......