John Cairns, Codification, Transplants and History: Law Reform in Louisiana (1808) and Quebec (1866)

Published date01 May 2016
Date01 May 2016
Author
Pages244-245
DOI10.3366/elr.2016.0351

Although published in 2015, this work is nearly forty years old, originally conceived as a PhD thesis. Nothing much has been changed. When viewed as the dissertation that it was, it is cum laude. When viewed as a legal historical piece of research, it is a masterful, meticulous, painstakingly researched, detailed, and extremely insightful piece of historical and legal research. It can be claimed that it is the first systematic exploration of the Louisiana (1808) and Quebec (1866) codes in light of social and legal change, explaining the reasons for change and stasis. John Cairns indeed examined in this dissertation the complex and varying legal cultures of French, Spanish, Civilian, and Anglo-American antecedents of the two codes from which the redactors borrowed in drafting. He analysed in detail the sources and materials used by the codifiers whom he considered as law-makers. The two codifications are placed in their general legal, political, economic, and social contexts. For legal historians, especially those whose interest lie mainly in North America, there is an over-abundance of good material here. When viewed as a comparative endeavour, the methodology applied works well and provides a meaningful comparison mainly of areas of family law and employment, with contracts used as a test-bed. Some general conclusions are drawn on both codes though not all aspects of these codes are examined.

In Part I, Cairns discusses the need for such a study, the methods used, and the subjects to be covered. Short introductions to Louisiana and Quebec and the legal background for the two codifications are given. Part II deals with family law and employment in the two Codes. In family law, only the relationships between husband and wife, and parent and child, are considered, but in all their aspects. A general discussion on the 1808 Digest of Orleans and the Code of Lower Canada starts Part III, which ends in a section on final conclusions on codification, law making, and legal change.

Cairns points out that the choice of Louisiana and Quebec as suitable jurisdictions to study was made because both had rich juridical cultures, were societies in transition, and, being codified, easy to study. He first resolved one ongoing debate so familiar to those who study nineteenth century Louisiana: the origins of the 1808 Code. Through this study, no doubt remains that the French rather than the Spanish are the predominant sources. In family law, the relationship between husband...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT