John Hall, Junior & Company v Rickman
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1906 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
Benson (Inspector of Taxes) v Yard Arm Club Ltd
...contended for the Company that ships and hulks were by their very nature "plant", on the authority of John Hall, Junior & Co. v. Rickman [1906] 1 KB 311, and capital expenditure on them therefore qualified for capital The Court of Appeal, dismissing the Company's appeal, held that the hulk ......
-
Lupton v Cadogan Gardens Developments Ltd
...on behalf of the parties and the cases cited to us, viz. Gutteridge v.Munyard (1834) 7 C. & P. 129; John Hall, Junior & Co. v. Rickman [1906] 1 K.B. 311; Macsaga Investment Co. Ltd. v. Lupton 44 T.C. 659; [1967] Ch. 1016;Heyhoe v. Slough Theatre Co. Ltd. (1933) 17 T.C. 488;Union Cold Storag......
-
Macsaga Investment Company Ltd v Lupton (HM Inspector of Taxes)
...100 per cent. of prime cost and still the trader was allowed to go on deducting a percentage: see John Hall, Junior & Co. v.Rickman [1906] 1 K.B. 311. In the next year Parliament intervened to prevent him from deducting in total any more than the actual cost. In cases of that kind (when the......
-
Lupton (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Cadogan Gardens Development Ltd
...on behalf of the parties and the cases cited to us, viz. Gutteridge v.Munyard (1834) 7 C. & P. 129; John Hall, Junior & Co. v. Rickman [1906] 1 K.B. 311; Macsaga Investment Co. Ltd. v. Lupton 44 T.C. 659; [1967] Ch. 1016;Heyhoe v. Slough Theatre Co. Ltd. (1933) 17 T.C. 488;Union Cold Storag......
Request a trial to view additional results