John Hall, Junior & Company v Rickman
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1906 |
Date | 1906 |
Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
19 cases
-
Benson (Inspector of Taxes) v Yard Arm Club Ltd
...1 W.L.R. 1398 approved. John Hall, Junior & Co. v. Rickman [1906] 1 K.B. 311 distinguished. Decision of Goulding J. [1978] 1 W.L.R. 1217; [1978] 2 All E.R. 958 affirmed. The following cases are referred to in the judgments: Cooke v. Beach Station Caravans Ltd. [1974] 1 W.L.R. 1398; [197......
-
Macsaga Investment Company Ltd v Lupton (HM Inspector of Taxes)
...100 per cent. of prime cost and still the trader was allowed to go on deducting a percentage: see John Hall, Junior & Co. v.Rickman [1906] 1 K.B. 311. In the next year Parliament intervened to prevent him from deducting in total any more than the actual cost. In cases of that kind (when the......
-
Lupton (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Cadogan Gardens Development Ltd
...on behalf of the parties and the cases cited to us, viz. Gutteridge v.Munyard (1834) 7 C. & P. 129; John Hall, Junior & Co. v. Rickman [1906] 1 K.B. 311; Macsaga Investment Co. Ltd. v. Lupton 44 T.C. 659; [1967] Ch. 1016;Heyhoe v. Slough Theatre Co. Ltd. (1933) 17 T.C. 488;Union Cold Storag......
-
Benson (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Yard Arm Club Ltd
...contended for the Company that ships and hulks were by their very nature "plant", on the authority of John Hall, Junior & Co. v. Rickman [1906] 1 KB 311, and capital expenditure on them therefore qualified for capital The Court of Appeal, dismissing the Company's appeal, held that the hulk ......
Get Started for Free