John Pledall port Action de Transgr v V Villiam Knap & auters pur prisel de
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 356
DEL COMMON-BANK
John Pledall port Action de Transgr
and
ers V Villiam Knap & auters pur prisel de
CXXXIX. John Pledall port Action de Transgr vera V Villiam Knap & auters puc prisel de certain Beefs & Ewes a Speraal en le County de Berk, les Defendants convey title al lieu ou & justifie le prisel de les Chattels pur damage feasant, a que le Plaintiff dit que lea Defendants apres le prisel eux enchase bora del dit County al vil de Oxford en le County de Oxford, & la vende les avers a divers persona nient conus a le dit John Pledall pur divers sums de money queux ila convert a lour proper use, sur quel Plee fuit demurr en jugement, & apres argument jugement fuit clone pur le plaintiff pur ceo que ceo fuit un abuser del distress prise per 1'enchaser, &...
To continue reading
Request your trial
19 cases
-
House of Fraser Plc v A.C.G.E. Investments Ltd
...4(B)( d) that the average of the mean prices over the relevant period was 45p. per share in the case of the 3.85 per cent. preference shares and 65p. in the case of the 5.25 per cent. preference shares. The reduction of capital accordingly provided for the second preference shareholders to ......
-
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Thiyagarajah
...Minister, ‘if not so satisfied, is to refuse to grant the visa’. 51 The first matter which emerges from the combined operation of ss 47( 1) and 65(1) of the Act is that the decision maker — relevantly, in this case, the Tribunal — had a duty to consider the application42. Correspondingly, M......
-
[1] Frederick Harrigan [2] Hamlet Harrigan [3] Island Real Estate Company Ltd Appellants v [1] Clement Daniels [2] Galaxy Shoppe (Anguilla) Ltd Respondents [ECSC]
... ... locus standi to sue as Plaintiffs in this action ... 12 ... ...
-
Loris James Appellant v Attorney General of Saint Christopher and Nevis Respondent [ECSC]
...below is set aside and the appellant is awarded his costs in the court below and in this court in accordance with Parts 65.5 (2)(b)(iii) and 65.13 (b) of CPR 2000, respectively. Justice of Appeal [Ag.] I concur. Chief Justice [Ag.] I agree that the appeal should be allowed. Errol L. Thomas ......
Request a trial to view additional results