John Shaw & Sons (Salford) Ltd v Peter and John Shaw
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1935 |
| Date | 1935 |
| Year | 1935 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
90 cases
- Bamford v Bamford
- Tee Chin Yong and Others; United Investment and Finance Ltd
-
Thompson (John) and Janet Thompson v Goblin Hill Hotels Ltd, Mies Investments Ltd, Marvin Goodman and Rosalie Goodman
...bound to actin accordance wi th the resol ution. 154 142 . The break with the past was confirmed by John Shaw and Sons v Peter Shaw [1935] 2 K.B. 113. There an article of association distingui shable in wording but not in meaning to article 82 of GHHL's articles came before the courts. Lord......
- Quality Concrete Holdings Berhad v Classic Gypsum Manufacturing Sdn Bhd
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
The Hollinger Ruling - A BVI Perspective
...in his capacity as majority shareholder, but he also breached his fiduciary duties as a director. Footnotes 1 Title 8 Chapter 1 2 [1935] 2 KB 113 at 134 3 [1900] 1 Ch 656 at 657 4 In Sidebottom v Kersaw Leese & Co [1920] 1 Ch 154, Lord Stendale indicated that "the limitation on the powe......
6 books & journal articles
-
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
...& Axtens v Salmon[1909] 1 Ch 311; [1909] AC 442; Gramophone and Typewriter Ltd v Stanley[1908] 2 KB 89; Shaw & Sons (Salford) Ltd v Shaw[1935] 2 KB 113; Scott v Scott[1943] 1 All ER 582; Black White and Grey Cabs Ltd v Fox[1969] NZLR 824; Bamford v Bamford[1970] Ch 212. The position in the ......
-
Does the Corporations Power Extend to Reconstituting Corporations?
...akin to agency.' 48 Marshall's Valve Gear Co Ltd v Manning Wardles & Co Ltd [1909] 1 Ch 267. 49 John Shaw & Sons (Salford) Ltd v Shaw [1935] 2 KB 113, 134. 50 Winthrop Investments Ltd v Winns Ltd [1975] 2 NSWLR 666, 683–4 (Samuels JA). 82 Federal Law Review Volume 39 _______________________......
-
Shareholders and takeover regulation in the commonwealth caribbean: some preliminary issues
.... 34 This replaced Article 80 of the Companies Act (CA) 1948. Sch.1 35 Quin & Axtens v. Salmon [1909] A.C 442.; Shaw & Sons v. Shaw [1935] 2 K.B. 113. to matters specifically reserved to the company in general meeting by the articles or by the Companies Act* 36 Regional statutes attempt to ......
-
Political Donations by Australian Companies
...Corporations Act, s 198A (a replaceable rule), and equivalent provisions in companyconstitutions; John Shaw & Sons (Salford) Ltd v Shaw [1935] 2 KB 113.109 Ian M Ramsay, 'Corporate Governance, Shareholder Litigation and the Prospects for aStatutory Derivative Action' (1992) 15 University of......
Get Started for Free