John v Dodwell & Company
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1918 |
| Date | 1918 |
| Year | 1918 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 cases
-
George Raymond Zage III and Another v Rasif David and Others
...as “the Agency Cheque Cases”. I will adopt the same description for convenience. 179 In John and others v Dodwell and Company Limited [1918] AC 563 (“John’s case”), the respondents (“Dodwell”) were carrying on business as import and export merchants at various places through branch offices,......
-
Reckitt v Barnett, Pembroke and Slater
...by the Power of Attorney and the Appellant is not bound by it. The case is really on all fours with the case of ( John v. Dodwell 1918, A.C., 563) and in my judgment Mr. Justice Rowlatt was right in following that case. The judgment of Russell J. appears to me quite accurate in its reasoni......
-
155569 Canada Ltd. v. 248524 Alberta Ltd. et al., (1995) 170 A.R. 183 (QB)
...83; 77 A.R. 74 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 37]. James, Ex parte (1803), 32 E.R. 385 (L.C.), refd to. [para. 37]. John v. Dodwell & Co., [1918] A.C. 563 (P.C.), refd to. [para. John M.M. Troup Ltd. v. Royal Bank (1962), 34 D.L.R.(2d) 556 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 37]. Joncas v. Pennock (No. ......
-
Blueberry River Indian Band and Doig River Indian Band v. Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development), (1993) 151 N.R. 241 (FCA)
...property 'under a transmitted fiduciary obligation to account for it', to the cestui que trust or principal: John V. Dodwell & Co. , [1918] A.C. 563, at p. 569." I have difficulty in accepting the appellants' argument that the Director of VLA had knowledge of the fiduciary duty merely b......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Spangaro v. Corporate Investment Australia Funds Management Ltd.: failure of consideration (failure of basis) as a claim in unjust enrichment.
...also be based simply on the receipt, treating it as a restitutionary claim independent of any wrongdoing: see John v Dodwell & Co Ltd [1918] AC 563. (149) The strength of the strict liability position, and the unjust enrichment rationale which explains it, is clear from a simple example......