John Wootton against Penelope Hele
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1796 |
| Date | 01 January 1796 |
| Court | High Court |
English Reports Citation: 86 E.R. 892
IN THE COURTS OF KING'S BENCH, CHANCERY, COMMON PLEAS AND EXCHEQUER.
case 37. john wootton against penelope hele. Michaelmas Term, 21 Car. 2, Roll 210. If husband and wife levy a fine stir co-nceasit to A. for ninety-nine years, if he should so long live, with a general warranty against all persons during the said term, an action of covenant will, on the death of the husband, lie against the wife upon the warranty.-S. C. ante, 66. S. C. 2 Saund. 177. S. C. 1 Lev. 301. S. C. 1 Sid. 466. S. C. 2 Keb. 684, 703, 709, 723. S. C. 2 Danv. 50. 1 Roll. Rep. 352. 2 Roll. Rep. 63. Goclb. 276. Poph. 136. 1 Bulst. 21. 3 Bulst. 163. Cro. Jac. 240, 399, 521. 4 Co. 4. 2 Mod. 213. 3 Mod. 135. 10 Mod. 469, 476. 12 Mod. 444. 1 Lev. 301. 2 Lev. 37, 194. 3 Lev. 325. 1 Vent. 184. 2 Vent. 61. Vaugh. 118. Ray. 371. 1 Vern. 41. 2 Vern. 61. 3 Peer. Wins. 189. 2 Saund. 180. In covenant on a general warranty against all persons during a term, a breach assigned that A. habens legale jus et titulum entered, &c. is not, tho'after verdict, sufficiently certain, without shewing what title A. had.-Ante, 66, 101. 9 Co. 61. Co. Ent. 117. Dyer, 328. Yelv. 227. Cro. Eliz. 823, 914. Cro. Jac. 312. 2 Vent. 252, 271. 4 Mod. 78. 3 Mod. 135. 2 Lev. 37. 1 Lev. 83, 301. 2 Vent. 62. 3 Lev. 325. Dougl. 43. 3 Bac. Abr. 715. 1 Term Rep. 671. 3 Term Rep. 584. In covenant on a general warranty for quiet enjoyment, the defect, in assigning a breach that A. having lawful title entered, &c. without shewing what title he had, is not cured by a verdict for the plaintiff, in an issue on a plea protesting that A. had not any lawful title, and affirming that he did not disturb the plaintiff. -Ante, 102. 3 Mod. 135. 1 Lev. 83. 2 Saund. 177. 3 Lev. 305. Carth. 389. Cro. Jac. 44. 3 Black. Com. 394. 5 Com. Dig. 44, 83. 1 H. Bl. Rep. 275. 1 Term Rep. 671. Covenant upon a fine. The plaintiff declares, that whereas qttidem finis se levavit in Curid nuper pretens. cuslodum libertalis Anglice authoritate Parliamenti de Banco apud Westmonast. &c. a die Sancti Michaelis in unum mensem anno Domini 1649, corarn Olimro St. John, Johanne Pulison, Petro Warburtmi, et Leonard Atkins, Justic. i&c. inter pnnd. Johannem Wootton, &c. quer. et prced. Johannem Hele et Penelopen Hele per nmnina Johannis Hele armigeri, et Penelopes uxoris ejus, deforc. inter alia de uno messuagio, &c. Per quern tinem prced. Johannes Hele et Penelope concesserunt pned. tenementa pmd. John 1 MOD. 291. MICHAELMAS TERM, 22 CAE. 2. IN B. R. 893 Wootton, habendum et lenendum, &c. pro termino 99 annorum proximorum post decessum Gulielmi Wootton, &c. si Johannes Wootton modb querens et Gratia Wootton tanuliu vixerint, aut eorum alter tamdiu -vixerit, et prced. J. Hele et Penelope et hcered ipsius Johnnnis warrant prced. Jo. Wootton prced. tenemenla, &c. contra, omnes homines pro toto termino prced. prout per recordum finis prced. &c. plenius apparet. Virtute cujus quidem finis prced. J. Wootton fait possessionat. de interesse pned. termini, &c. et sic inde possessionat. existens prced. Guild. Wootton, &c. poslea, scil. sexto die, &c. abierunt, post quorum mortem pned. J, Wootton in tenementa prced. &c. intravit et fuit inde possessionat. &c. et sic inde possessionat. existens prced. J. Hele postea, scil. &c. obiit et prced. Penelope ipsum supervixit. Et idem Johannes Wootton in facto (licit qubd quidem Hugo Stowel armiger, post...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Roberts against Marriot
...poor's rate) will make the party a. trespasser ob initio. 11 Geo. 2, c. 19. Espinas. Dig. 56, 8. 892 MICHAELMAS TERM, 22 CAR. 2. IN B. R. 1MOD.290. The Court. The defendant having first pleaded nullum fenerunt arbilrium, and then, in his rejoinder, that it was not delivered (which is a conf......
-
Wood v Davies
...poor's rate) will make the party a. trespasser ob initio. 11 Geo. 2, c. 19. Espinas. Dig. 56, 8. 892 MICHAELMAS TERM, 22 CAR. 2. IN B. R. 1MOD.290. The Court. The defendant having first pleaded nullum fenerunt arbilrium, and then, in his rejoinder, that it was not delivered (which is a conf......
-
Browing v S. Wright and Others, Executors of J. Wright
...this qualification, would be bad after verdict. Kirby v. Hansaker, Cro. Jao. 315. Woolen v. Hele, 2 Saund. 177. 1 Lev. 301. 1 Sid. 466. 1 Mod. 290. S. C. Jenkins, 340. This may be done how ever by averring generally, that the person evicting had lawful title before the date of the grant to ......