Johnson Matthey & Company Ltd v Constantine Terminals Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
| Year | 1976 |
| Date | 1976 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
14 cases
-
The Pioneer Container (K.H. Enterprise)
... ... 1262 , P.C. applied ... Johnson Matthey & Co. Ltd. v. Constantine Terminals Ltd. [ 1976 ] ... by Hanjin Container Lines (“Hanjin”), a Korean company, in respect of the carriage of the goods from the United ... ...
- Ship KH Ent v Ship Pioneer Container
-
Transcontainer Express Ltd v Custodian Security Ltd
...he supported by reference to a number of authorities such as Edwards v. Newland (1950) 1 A.E.R. 1072 and Johnson Matthey & Co. Ltd. v. Constantine Terminals Ltd. & Another (1972) 2 Lloyds Rep. 215, that it is in law quite possible for a person to create a relationship of bailor and ......
-
The Mahkutai
... ... 291 , C.A ... Johnson Matthey & Co. Ltd. v. Constantine Terminals Ltd. [ 1976 ] ... ...
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Third party rights under shipping contracts in English and South African law
...Phang 'Exception Clauses and Negligence — The Influence of Contract in Bailment and Tort' (1989) 9 Oxford J of Legal Studies 418. 77 [1976] 2 Lloyd's Rep 215 (QBD). Donaldson J described the reasoning in Elder, Dempster supra note 44 as 'something of a judicial nightmare' (at 219). See J Be......