Johnson Matthey & Company Ltd v Constantine Terminals Ltd
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1976 |
Date | 1976 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
The Pioneer Container (K.H. Enterprise)
...conditions, but not otherwise". That statement had not been followed in Johnson Matthey & Co Ltd v Constantine Terminals LtdUNK ((1976) 2 Lloyd's Rep 215). In order to decide whether to accept the principle so stated by Lord Denning, it was necessary to consider the relevance of the concept......
-
Ship Starsin, Re, (2003) 307 N.R. 100 (HL)
...Lloyd's Rep. 164. It was not, however, followed by Donaldson, J., in Johnson Matthey & Co. Ltd. v. Constantine Terminals Ltd. , [1976] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 215, a decision to which their Lordships will revert at a later stage. "In order to decide whether, like Steyn, J., to accept the princip......
-
London Drugs Ltd. v. Brassart and Vanwinkel, (1992) 18 B.C.A.C. 1 (SCC)
...Council, [1991] 1 A.C. 398; 113 N.R. 81 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 173]. Johnson Matthey & Co. v. Constantine Terminals Ltd., [1976] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 215 (Q.B. (Com. Ct.)), consd. [para. Kamahap Enterprises Ltd. v. Chu's Central Market Ltd. (1989), 64 D.L.R.(4th) 167 (B.C.C.A.), consd. [para......
-
London Drugs Ltd. v. Brassart and Vanwinkel, (1992) 143 N.R. 1 (SCC)
...Council, [1991] 1 A.C. 398; 113 N.R. 81 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 173]. Johnson Matthey & Co. v. Constantine Terminals Ltd., [1976] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 215 (Q.B. (Com. Ct.)), consd. [para. Kamahap Enterprises Ltd. v. Chu's Central Market Ltd. (1989), 64 D.L.R.(4th) 167 (B.C.C.A.), consd. [para......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Third party rights under shipping contracts in English and South African law
...Phang 'Exception Clauses and Negligence — The Influence of Contract in Bailment and Tort' (1989) 9 Oxford J of Legal Studies 418. 77 [1976] 2 Lloyd's Rep 215 (QBD). Donaldson J described the reasoning in Elder, Dempster supra note 44 as 'something of a judicial nightmare' (at 219). See J Be......