Johnson (trading as Johnson Butchers) v BJW Property Developments Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2002] EWHC 1131 (TCC)
Date2002
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • LMS International Ltd and Others v Styrene Packaging and Insulation Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 30 September 2005
    ...he was allowing him to escape the consequences of the 1774 Act. I agree with His Honour Judge Thornton QC in Johnson v B J W Property [2002] 3 ALL ER 574 when he commented on this point : "With respect to Mackenna J, however, the narrow meaning given to the Act which so concerned him is on......
  • Gore v Stannard (trading as Wyvern Tyres)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 4 October 2012
    ...86. This is confirmed by Emanuel. 127 It follows from this that I disagree with the view expressed by Judge Thornton QC in Johnson v BJW Property Developments Ltd [2002] EWHC 1131 (TCC) [2002] 3 All ER 574 and by Judge Coulson QC in LMS International Ltd v Styrene Packaging and Insulation ......
  • William Feeney v Alberto Andreucetti
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 10 February 2015
    ...Q.B. 1; [2013] 3 W.L.R. 623; [2013] All E.R. 694. H.& N. Emanuel Ltd. v. G.L.C. [1971] 2 All E.R. 835. Johnson v. B.J.W. Property [2002] EWHC 1131 (TCC), [2002] 3 All E.R. 574. Richards v. Easto (1846) 15 M. & W. 244. Richardson and Webster v. Athlone Woollen Mills [1942] I.R. 581; (1943) 7......
  • Willmott Dixon Construction Ltd v Robert West Consulting Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 21 December 2016
    ...from neighbouring property per Alcock v Wraith [1992] BLR 20 and Johnson (t/a Johnson Butchers) v BJW Property Developments Ltd [2002] 3 All ER 574." 6 The amendments to Response 14 are opposed by the claimant on the basis that they cannot succeed in law and/or that they will necessitate ev......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT