Johnson v Coventry Churchill International Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1992 |
| Year | 1992 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Parno v SC Marine Pte Ltd
...more foreign elements were present.In support of contention (b), the appellant relied on Johnson v Coventry Churchill International Ltd [1992] 3 All ER 14. In that case, the plaintiff entered into a contract of employment with the defendant company which placed English personnel seeking to ......
-
Athanasios Sophocleous & Others v The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
...applying its rule (that pain and suffering were not to be compensated) to persons resident outside Malta. 47 Similarly in Johnson v Coventry Churchill International Ltd [1992] 3 All ER 14 the claimant was permitted to recover for a tort committed in West Germany although there was no cause......
-
Goh Chok Tong v Tang Liang Hong
...results in the application of a particular forum`s law over double actionability. In Johnson v Coventry Churchill International Ltd [1992] 3 All ER 14 the plaintiff, a joiner, entered into what was held to be a contract of employment with the defendant company which placed English personnel......
-
Athanasios Sophocleous & Others v (1) Secretary of State for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office
...case was a personal injury action tried in Manchester by Mr J. Kay QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court: Johnson v. Coventry Churchill International Ltd [1992] 3 All ER 14. The English plaintiff was sent to work in Stuttgart by the defendant recruitment agency which employed him ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
THE EFFECTIVE REACH OF CHOICE OF LAW AGREEMENTS
...210 CLR 491, [2002] HCA 10. 38 Tolofsen v Jensen [1994] 3 SCR 1022. 39 The result of Johnson v Coventry Churchill International Ltd[1992] 3 All ER 14 could be explained on this basis though the actual reasoning was based on the closeness of the overall connections of the case with England, ......
-
Choice of law in Australian torts or the truth about conflicts
...his position, notably by insuring against liability which might arise, 123 more appositely, the judge seemed certain that the 116. [1992] 3 All ER 14 117. J W Kay Q C 118. [ 1992] 3 All ER 14 at 24. 119. [1971] AC 356 at 391. 120. [1992] 3 All ER 14 at 25. 121. In addition, all the defendan......
Request a trial to view additional results