Johnson v Diamond
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1855 |
| Year | 1855 |
| Court | Court of Exchequer Chamber |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
McKinnell v Robinson
...1215 EXCH. OF PLEAS. M'Kinnell and Robinson S. C. 1 H. & H. 146; 7 L. J. Ex. 149; 2 Jur. 595. Reffered to, Pearce v. Brooks 1866, L. R. 1 Ex. 217; Waugh v. Morris, 1873, L. R. 8 Q. B. 207; Thacker v. Hurdy, 1878, 4 Q. B. D. 687. M'KtNNELL v. robenson. Exch. of Pleas. 1838.-Money lent for th......
-
Rodwell v Phillips
...fruit is an agreement for the sale of an interest in land, and if of the value of .20 requires a stamp. [S. C. 1 Dowl. (N. S.) 885; 11 L. .1. Ex. 217.] This was an action of assumpsit, brought against the defendant for not permitting the plaintiff to gather certain fruit and vegetables, whi......
-
Winterbottom v Lees
...within four days without a rule for that purpose, and not rejoining within twenty-four hours after demand. [S. C. 5 I). & L. 744 ; 17 L. .1. Ex. 217.] Martin had obtained a rule calling on the plaintiff to shew cause why the issue, : notice of trial, Nisi Prius record, and the trial of this......
-
Hoffman-La Roche & Company v S.P. Musson Son & Company Ltd
... ... Miller (1948) 65 R.P.C. 141 at p. 160H.L.; Seed v. Higgins (1860) 8 H.L.C. 550 at 561; Patent Type Co. v. Richard (1859) Johnson" 381 at 385 – 6; Osram v. Z. Electric (1912) 29 R.P.C. 401 at 424; Stevens v. Keating (1847) 2 W.P.C. 172 at 188 – 9 that the question of \xE2\x80" ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results