Johnson v Johnson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1900
Date1900
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • John Peng v The State [1982] PNGLR 331
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Supreme Court
    • 28 July 1982
    ...in the minds of reasonable men ought to be affected. Craig v R (1933) 49 CLR 429, James Neap v The State (1982) SC228, Johnson v Johnson [1900] P 19; 69 LJP 13, Lawless v R (1979) 142 CLR 659; 53 ALJR 733, The Government of Papua New Guinea and Davis v Barker [1977] PNGLR 386, R v Aldrich [......
  • Underwood v Underwood
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
  • Rey v The Government of Switzerland
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • 1 July 1996
    ...have put forward on the first application, or which he could not then reasonably be expected to have put forward: see Johnson v. Johnson [1900] P. 19 and Reg. v. Medical appeal Tribunal (North Midland Region), ex parte Hubble [1959] 2 Q.B. 408.” 13 (At pages 1422 -1423) 14 In Yat Tong Inves......
  • R. v. Bayuk, 2020 ONSC 7928
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 17 December 2020
    ...font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} CITATION: R. v. Bayuk, 2020 ONSC 7928 COURT FILE NO.: CRIMJ(P) 1900/19 DATE: 2020 12 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE     B E T W E E N: )     )   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ) ) ))) Jennifer Goulin, for the Crown......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • FRESH EVIDENCE
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon’s Judicial Dictionary of Nigerian Law. First edition F
    • 6 February 2019
    ...having become newly available and obtainable." The learned Justice cited, with approval, the dictum of Sir. Francis Jeune, P. in Johnson (1900) Pp. 19-20 to the effect: - "The question raised in this case is of general interest but to my mind, absolutely free from doubt. The Summary Jurisdi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT