Johnston

JurisdictionScotland
Judgment Date07 November 1899
Date07 November 1899
Docket NumberNo. 20.
CourtCourt of Session
Court of Session
1st Division

Lord Adam, Lord M'Laren, Lord Kinnear.

No. 20.
Johnston.

Nobile OfficiumAuthority to alter name.

As a person does not require the authority of the Court to change his name, the Court will not grant authority except on special cause shewn.

Circumstances in which a petition by a clergyman for authority to alter his name granted.

The Reverend Henry Johnston presented a petition for authority to assume the name of Lindsay, in addition to his name of Henry Johnston, and to call and subscribe himself Henry Lindsay Johnston, and to ordain the petition, and the deliverance thereon, to be recorded in the Books of Sederunt.

The petitioner stated;That the petitioner's name was entered in the Register of Births, &c., and in his certificate of baptism, as Henry Johnston. That for some years past the petitioner has adopted and used the name of Henry Lindsay Johnston, and as such has been commonly known. That in particular the petitioner's name is entered as Henry Lindsay Johnston in the books of Trinity College, Cambridge, and of the University of Cambridge, where he took his degree in the year 1897. That on the occasion of the petitioner's ordination as a deacon of the Church of England the Bishop of Rochester, through his diocesan secretaries, refused to enter in the petitioner's letters of orders any other name than was contained in his certificate of baptism, without evidence that said name had been assumed with authority. That the petitioner is about to enter into

priest's orders in said Church, and that he is informed that the Bishop of Rochester, through his said diocesan secretaries, will again refuse to insert in his letters of orders the name Henry Lindsay Johnston. That it is of importance to the petitioner, as a clergyman of the Church of England, that the name appearing in his letters of orders should be the same as that under which he took his degree at the University of Cambridge.

Lord Adam.The petitioner's application is for authority to alter his name. Now, any person in Scotland may, without the authority of the Court, call himself what he pleases, and, accordingly, when a petition for such a purpose is presented, we are in use to dismiss it as unnecessary, unless sufficient reason is shewn for the application. The question, therefore, is whether there is good reason in this case. The reason assigned is that the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Zuk v Alberta Dental Association and College, 2018 ABCA 270
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 21 Agosto 2018
    ...made for a “political” purpose is demonstrably incorrect. The record demonstrates that the Hearing Tribunal was aware of it (AR, Vol 2, F75-F76, paras 425-426) but did not endorse the distinction as a means of determining whether a statement was “advertising” or not. Instead, the Hearing Tr......
  • Hksar v Fok Lap Yin, Ian Lee Christoffer
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 11 Agosto 2015
    ...18 years, and his friend Chan Ming-tin (“Chan”) attacked the applicant’s parents, Mr and Mrs Fok, whilst they were asleep in the bedroom at 2/F, 75, Wang Toi Shan Shan Tsuen, Pat Heung. Mr Fok died of loss of blood and respiratory failure, having received over 100 stab wounds, whilst Mrs Fo......
  • Sands Contracting Pty Ltd v Foodcorp (VIC) Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 4 Septiembre 2020
    ...regs 5.6.12-5.6.36A (repealed) Insolvency Practice Rules (Corporations) 2016 (Cth) rr 70-15, 70-15(2)(a), 70-15(2)(c), 70-15(2)(e), 70-15(2)(f), 75-85(1), 75-85(2), 75-85(3), 75-85(4), 75-95, 75 100(1), 75-100(2), Divs 70, 75 Cases cited: AMP Music Box Enterprises Ltd v Hoffman [2002] BCC 9......
2 books & journal articles
  • Scots Law News
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh Law Review No. , May 2008
    • 1 Mayo 2008
    ...Kerr argued that any person in Scotland can call him or herself what he or she likes without the authority of the court (Johnston, Ptr (1899) 2 F 75), and that the Lord Lyon's only right of refusal is in respect of names which are obscene, racist, offensive, or where the application is friv......
  • LONG‐RUN M3 DEMAND IN SOUTH AFRICA: A COINTEGRATED VAR MODEL
    • South Africa
    • Wiley South African Journal of Economics No. 75-4, December 2007
    • 1 Diciembre 2007
    ...479-494.Table A1. Tests for model reductionSYS(5) →SYS(4): F(25,198) =1.2990 [0.1646]SYS(5) →SYS(3): F(50,245) =1.3888 [0.0553]SYS(5) →SYS(2): F(75,258) =1.3626 [0.0405]*SYS(5) →SYS(1): F(100,263)=1.6034 [0.0016]**SYS(4) →SYS(3): F(25,216 ) =1.4516 [0.0831]SYS(4) →SYS(2): F(50,267) =1.3646 ......
1 provisions

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT