Jones and Others, against Roe, Lessee of Perry
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1789 |
| Date | 1789 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
Purefoy v Rogers and Others
...Goodright v. Searle. 1 Bl. Rep. 605, Roe v. Griffiths. Moor v. Hawkins, before Lord Northington, cited in 1 H. Black. 30, Roe v. Jones, and 3 T. R. 88, where Roe v. Jones was affirmed in K. B. on error. Gas. temp. Talb. 117, King v. Withers.(u) (t) [These and subsequent cases have fully est......
-
Meek v Kettlewell
...died in her lifetime without leaving issue. An interest of that kind would have been devisable under the Statute of Wills;' Jonw v. Roe, (3 T. R. 88); and would pass to the assignees in bankruptcy; Hiyden v. Williamson (3 P. W. 131); and though it did not therefore follow that it would be a......
-
John Lumley Savile, Earl of Scarborough, against Doe on the demise of Frederick Lumley Savile, Esquire
...(M'Clel. & Y. 58). V. In the firat place, the right of the lessor of the plaintiff below was assignable ; Jones v. Roe, Lessee of Perry (3 T. R. 88; and see pp. 93, 95), Doe dem. Cooper v. Finch (4 B. & Ad. 304. 1 N. & M. 170). It is a possibility coupled with an interest. Secondly, such in......
-
Matthew v Osborne
...law prevailed in this country. But, was land devisable a little before the statute 34 H. 8, c. 5 ?] Probably not. In Jones v. Roe d. Perry, 3 T. R. 88, 94, Lord Kenyon says: " I will not cite all the cases that may be mentioned on the subject, but will confine myself to two or three which h......
Request a trial to view additional results