Jones v Andrews
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1888 |
| Year | 1888 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
-
Farrell v Everyday Finance DAC
... ... It continued to be followed after the Judicature Act, as can be seen, for example, in Jones v. Andrews (1888) 58 L.T. at 601 ; and is referred to by textwriters both present and past: see Bray on Discovery, at 237…” ... ...
-
R (on the application of the Secretary of State for the Home Department) v First-Tier Tribunal (IAC) (Litigation privilege; First-Tier Tribunal)
...part can be covered without destroying the sense of the rest or making it misleading, a party is permitted to do so. In Jones v. Andrew, 58 L.T. 601 an application to require a party to uncover parts of sentences of which the rest had been disclosed was, on the facts, unsuccessful: compare ......
-
Anthony Leslie Hancock v Promontoria (Chestnut) Ltd
...the circumstances of the case – that the affidavit does not truly state that which it ought to state:” per Cotton LJ in Jones v Andrews (1888) 58 L.T. 601, 604.” 86 To similar effect, Leggatt LJ said in the same case, at 176H: “The plaintiffs are obliged to disclose the relevant parts of do......
-
Mr R Frewer v Google UK Limited and Others
...circumstances of the case—that the affidavit does not truly state that which it ought to state:’ per Cotton LJ in Jones v Andrews (1888) 58 LT 601, 604.” 86 To similar effect, Leggtt LJ said in the same case, at pp The plaintiffs are obliged to disclose the relevant parts of documents, but ......
Request a trial to view additional results