Jones v Attorney General of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtPrivy Council
Judgment Date1995
Date1995
Year1995

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
29 cases
  • The Queen v Peter Hughes
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 11 March 2002
    ...the death penalty discretionary in what was then the colony of Saint Lucia. Similarly, as the Board observed in Jones v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas [1995] 1 WLR 891, 895A, if any such radical change in the law had been intended, it is inconceivable that it would hav......
  • Newton Spence Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
    • St Lucia
    • Court of Appeal (Saint Lucia)
    • 2 April 2001
    ...by the courts, for well over a century, to mean a mandatory death sentence. See Larry R Jones v Attorney General of The Bahamas (1995) 1 WLR p.891 where the Privy Council held that notwithstanding the word "liable", in a similarly worded provision, the plain meaning of the section was that ......
  • Thomas and Another v Baptiste and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 17 March 1999
    ... ... of the Supreme Court) and (3) The Attorney General Respondents [1999] UKPC ... They observe, however, that the Constitution of The Bahamas which was under consideration in that case does not include ... ...
  • Bowe and another v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 8 March 2006
    ...correct and was not challenged in argument. It is plain from the history briefly summarised in Jones v Attorney-General of the Bahamas [1995] 1 WLR 891, 894-895, that the common law rule which required sentence of death to be passed on a defendant convicted of murder was given effect in Th......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • The privy council: the mandatory death penalty is inhuman and degrading treatment
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 16-1, June 2006
    • 1 June 2006
    ...of the Act also gives the Court of Appeal the power to 10 Ibid, para 5. 11 Ibid, para 7. 12 Jones v Attorney-General of the Bahamas [1995] 1 WLR 891. 13 Ibid, 894-895. 14 The Judgment para 8. quash any sentence it deems necessary and to pass any other sentence warranted in law by the verdic......