Jones v Bailey
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 16 December 1853 |
| Date | 16 December 1853 |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
English Reports Citation: 51 E.R. 1161
ROLLS COURT
/ -f [582] jones i'. bailey. Dec. 16, 1853. The relief to which a judgment creditor is entitled, under the 1 & 2 Viet. c. 110 (sect. 13), ia a foreclosure, and not a sale. The Plaintiff obtained a charge on the Defendant's real estates, by virtue of a judgment obtained in 1852, and under the provisions of the 1 & 2 Viet. c. 110. He filed the present bill, praying a declaration of the validity of the charge on the estate, and in default of payment, for a sale of the estate and payment thereout of the debt and costs. A question arose, whether the Plaintiff was entitled to a sale or foreclosure. Mr. Fleming, for the Plaintiff, insisted on his right to a sale. He referred to the 15 & 16 Viet. c. 86 (sect. 48). The Defendant did not appear. the master of the bolls [Sir John Romilly]. The Plaintiff has that which is equivalent to an agreement to execute a legal mortgage ; and if that were done, the Plaintiff would only be entitled to a foreclosure. I think he is entitled to that decree, and shall order accordingly. I cannot on. this record act upon the recent statute, in the absence of the Defendant. note.- See Pain v. Smith, 2 Myl. & K. 417; Parker v. Housefield, 2 Myl. & K. 419 ; Perry v. Keane, Coote on Mortgages, 713 ; [583] Price v. Carver, 3 Myl. & Craig, 157 ; Farrow v. Sees, 4 Beav. 25 ; Carlon v. Farlar, 8 Beav. 525 ; Brocklehurst v. Jessop, 1 Sim. 438; Meller v. Woods, 1 Keen, 16 ; Lewis v...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Shea v Moore
...and, I may ask, where is the forfeiture (1) I Dr. & War. 195. (2) 6 Ir. Eq. R. 424. (3) 3 De G. M. & Or. 515. (4) 6 Hare, 229. (5) 17 Beav. 582. (6) 21 Beav. 559. Vol. I. (7) 4 Giff. 518. (8) L. R. 17 Eq. 435. (9) 5 De G. & S. 736. (10) 2 K. & J. 71. (11) 10 Hare, 30. (12) 7 App. Cas. 235. ......
-
M'Auley v Clarendon
...Kinderley v. JervisENR 22 Beav. 1. Beavan v. Lord Oxford 6 De G., M'N & G. 522, 523. Ford v. WastellENR 6 Hare, 229. Jones v. BaileyENR 17 Beav. 582. Footner v. SturgesENR 5 De G. & S. 736. Rolleston v. Morton 1 Dr. & War. 195. Ex Parte Boyle 3 De G., M'N. & G. 53. Beavan v. Lord Oxford 6 D......
-
Tuckley v Thompson
...Plaintiff being an equitable mortgagee makes no difference, for his strict right is only to foreclosure and not to sale: Jones v. Bailey (17 Beav. 582), Messer v. Boyle (21 Beav. 559), Parker v. Housefield (2 My. & K. 419), Cox v. Toole (20 Beav. 145), Crosse v. General Reversionary and Inv......
-
Scweitzer v Mayhew
...entitled to a sale. note. - See Sampson v. Pattison, 1 Hare, 533 ; Jenkin v. Rrnu, 5 De. G-. & Sm. 109, and the note to Jones v. Bailey, 17 Beav. 582 ; and Ex parte Pettit, 2 Glyn & J. 47. English Reports Citation: 54 E.R. 1051 ROLLS COURT Scweitzer and Mayhew [37] scweitzer v. mayhew. Jan......