Jones v Stone
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judgment Date | 1894 |
Year | 1894 |
Date | 1894 |
Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
112 cases
- Clarke v Union Bank of Australia Ltd
-
Wong, Wen-Young v Grand View Private Trust Company Ltd
...is entitled to judgment, and where therefore it is inexpedient to allow a defendant to defend for mere purposes of delay” ( Jones v Stone [1894] AC 122). As a general principle, where a defendant shows that he has a fair case for defence, or reasonable grounds for setting up a defence, or e......
-
Wong, Wen-Young (also known as Winston Wong) and Wong, Ray-Tseng (also known as Riley Wong) (an infant by his Next Friend, Grace Tsu Han Wong) v Grand View Private Trust Company Ltd
...entitled to judgment, and where therefore it is inexpedient to allow a defendant to defend for mere purposes of delay” ( Jones v. Stone [1894] A.C. 122). As a general principle, where a defendant shows that he has a fair case for defence, or reasonable grounds for setting up a defence, or e......
-
Stoney Tribal Council v Canadian Pacific Railway, 2017 ABCA 432
...Alta. L.R. 5th 126, 131 (“summary judgment should only be granted if the matter is factually and legally beyond doubt”); Jones v. Stone, [1894] A.C. 122, 124 (P.C. 1894)(W. Austl.)(the Court, commenting on the English Rules of the Supreme Court, Ord. 14, stated: “[summary judgment] is ... i......
Request a trial to view additional results