Jordan against Wilcoxon
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 19 January 1854 |
| Date | 19 January 1854 |
| Court | Court of the Queen's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 118 E.R. 1113
COURTS OF QUEENS BENCH AND THE COURT OF EXCHEQUER CHAMBER.
S. C. 18 Jur. 555.
jordan against wilcoxon. Thursday, January 19th, 1854. The rule that an application to set aside a Judge's order cannot be made after the end of the term next following the making of the order applies to an order made by a Judge at Chambers, prohibiting a County Court from proceeding, under stats. 9 & 10 Viet, c. 95, s. 58, and 13 & 14 Viet. c. 61, s. 22. [S. C. 18 Jur. 555.] Honyman moved for a rule nisi to set aside an order made by Parke B., at Chambers, under stat. 9 & 10 Viet. c. 95, s. 58, and stat. 13 & 14 Viet. c. 61, s. 22, prohibiting all further proceedings in a plaint depending between the parties in the County Court of Lancashire held at Liverpool, for want of jurisdiction. He stated that the order was made on 22d June 1853, so that a whole term had elapsed: but he suggested that the case of prohibition might be looked upon as an exception to the ordinary rule: and he referred to De Haber v. Queen of Portugal (17 Q. B. 171), where it was held by this Court that a prohibition for want of jurisdiction might be awarded at the instance of a stranger, on the ground that it was a contempt of the Crown for the inferior Court to proceed without juris-[194] diction : and he contended that in like manner...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rondalia Versekeringskorporasie van Suid-Afrika Bpk v Lemmer
...of as 'n redelik diensbare hulpbevoegdheid, in die magtigende bepaling ingelees moet word. Vgl. Steyn, Uitleg van Wette, 3de uitg., bl. 193 - 8. As aanvaar word dat 11 bis (1) uitdruklik 'n regulasie magtig wat voorskryf in watter vorm die besonderhede uiteengesit moet word, wat dan die bev......
-
Welkom Bottling Co (Pty) Ltd en 'n Ander v Belfast Mineral Waters (OFS) (Pty) Ltd
...bevorder. Die doel sal gefnuik word indien die deposito nie aan enige persoon terugbetaalbaar is nie. Steyn, Uitleg van Wette, 3de uitg., bl. 193 - 8; Middelburg Municipality v Gertzen, 1914 AD 544 te bl. 552; R v Dickson, 1934 AD 231 te bl. 233. Indien 'n regulasie binne die raamwerk van '......
-
Mkwanazi v Van der Merwe and Another
...geval is nie verander nie. McKerron, op cit. op bl. 278; van der Merwe & Olivier, op. cit. op bl. 170; vgl. Annual Survey of SA Law, 1956 op bl. 193. 'n Bewering in 'n eiser se pleitstukke dat twee verweerders mededaders is in terme van art. 2 (1) van die Wet is genoegsaam om die voeging va......
-
Phame (Pty) Ltd v Paizes
...van die kontrak, te kan verhaal. In 'n later reeks artikels, nl. 'Misrepresentation, Warranty Estoppel, etc.' band 77 (1960) S.A.L.J., bl. 193 e.v. en bl. 323 e.v., bespreek Mulligan weer eens die probleem van 'innocent misrepresentation'. Op bl. 202 e.v. staan hy, tereg krities teenoor die......