Joyner v Weeks

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1891
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
77 cases
  • General Motors UK Ltd v The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 30 November 2016
    ...Holland QC submitted that MSCC was entitled to the cost of removal even if MSCC did not intend to remove the spillway. She referred me to Joyner v Weeks [1891] 2 QB 31. However that case was distinguished in James v Hutton [1949] 1 KB 9 in the following passage "To apply the rule as to the ......
  • Bowen Investments Pty Ltd v Tabcorp Holdings Ltd
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Burdis v Livsey ; Clark v Ardington Electrical Services ; Dennard v Plant ; Sen v Steelform Engineering Company Ltd ; Lagden v O'Connor
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 1 May 2002
    ...operation of this principle can also be seen in cases concerning breach of a covenant to repair contained in a lease (see, for example, Joyner v Weeks [1891] 2 QB 31 CA and Haviland v Long [1952] 2 QB 80 91 In our judgment, the authorities to which we have so far referred establish that s......
  • Radford v De Froberville
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... James v. Hutton & J. Cook & Sons Ltd. [ 1950 ] 1 K.B. 9 , C.A ... Jones v. Gooday ( 1841 ) 8 M. & W. 146 ... Joyner v. Weeks [ 1891 ] 2 Q.B. 31 , C.A ... Lesters Leather & Skin Co. Ltd. v. Home & Overseas Brokers Ltd. ( 1948 ) 64 T.L.R. 569 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
6 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • 21 June 2014
    ...(CA) ..............512, 513, Joyce v Dorvault, [2007] BCJ No 1195, 2007 BCSC 786 .................................... 196 Joyner v Weeks, [1891] 2 QB 31, 55 JP 725, 60 LJQB 510 (CA) ......................... 108 JRS v Glendinning, [2004] OJ No 285 (SCJ) ...........................................
  • Compensation for Harm to Property Interests
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Compensatory Damages
    • 21 June 2014
    ...UL Rev 1341. 147 JP Dawson & WB Harvey, Contracts and Contract Remedies (Brooklyn: Foundation Press, 1959) at 28. 148 Joyne r v Weeks , [1891] 2 QB 31; Buscombe v Stark (1916), [1917] 1 WWR 204 (BCCA); Church of Scientology of British Columbia v Ahmed (1983), 44 BCLR 297 (SC) [ Ahmed ]; Per......
  • Clark v. Macourt: defective sperm and performance substitutes in the High Court of Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 38 No. 2, December - December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...See, eg, Miles v Wakefield Metropolitan District Council [1987] 1 AC 539; National Coal Board v Galley [1957] 1 WLR 16; Joyner v Weeks [1891] 2 QB 31, approved by the High Court of Australia in Graham v The Markets Hotel Pty Ltd (1943) 67 CLR (101) [2001] 1 AC 518, 547 (Lord Goff), 593 (Lor......
  • Willfulness versus expectation: a promisor-based defense of willful breach doctrine.
    • United States
    • Michigan Law Review Vol. 107 No. 8, June 2009
    • 1 June 2009
    ...lease). (39.) 286 N.W. 235 (Minn. 1939); see also Am. Standard, Inc. v. Schectman, 439 N.Y.S.2d 529 (App. Div. 1981); Joyner v. Weeks, (1891) 2 Q.B. 31 (40.) See Timothy J. Muffs, Cost of Completion or Diminution in Market Value: The Relevance of Subjective Value, 12 J. LEGAL STUD. 379 (198......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT