Judd v Hammersmith, West London and St Mark's Hospital Board of Governors

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1960
Year1960
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Parry v Cleaver
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 5 February 1969
    ...taken into account." 19It is true that was a case under Lord Campbell's Act but the principle cannot be different. 20In Judd v. Hammersmith Hospital Board of Governors [1960] 1 W.L.R. 328 Finnemore J. followed the decision in Payne's case. The plaintiff had been a local government officer ......
  • Sin Hock Soon Transport Sdn Bhd v Low King Ban
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2006
  • Wood v British Coal Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 11 April 1991
    ...or punitive damages, or in certain cases dealing with the loss of use of a chattel;" 15 In Judd v. Hammersmith, West London and St. Mark's Hospitals Board of Governors [1960] 1 W.L.R. 328, the plaintiff, who was employed by a local authority, received injuries which rendered him incapable o......
  • Parry v Cleaver
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 May 1967
    ...contributions and deduct the portion attributable to his employers' contributions? There are cases in support of each view. 14According to Judd's case, 1960, 1 Weekly Law Reports, page 328, the police pension is to be ignored for Periods 1 and 2 (when he would have still been serving in the......
  • Get Started for Free