Judge v Judge
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2008] EWHC 101 (Fam) |
| Date | 2008 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Richardson v Richardson and Another
...– Barder v Calouori [1988] AC 20– and that one of them also demonstrated the order to have been vitiated by a common mistake of fact: see Judge v Judge [2008] EWCA Civ 1458, [2009] 1 FLR 1287, paras [3], [59]. The background 3 At the date of the hearing before Judge Raynor in June 2009, the......
-
Walkden v Walkden
...within the Barder principle, Hale J recognised that it was more akin to misrepresentation or non-disclosure. Subsequently in the case of Judge v Judge [2008] EWCA Civ 1458 Lord Justice Wilson stated that mistake as to value was no longer regarded as falling within the Barder principle. 46 A......
-
Gohil v Gohil
...proceedings for the setting aside of a financial order: Robinson v Robinson (Practice Note) [1982] 1 WLR 786, 786, and Judge v Judge [2008] EWCA Civ 1458, [2009] 1 FLR 1287, para 48. Indeed its observations to that effect in the Robinson case were quoted with approval by Lord Brandon of ......
-
Db v Dlj
... ... By way of anecdote, it is perhaps interesting to recall what I was once told many years ago by Michael Kerr, a former judge in the Court of Appeal and one of the leading figures in the recent development of the law of arbitration in England, when I was complaining about ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results