Jussa v Jussa

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtDivisional Court
Year1972
Date1972

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
34 cases
  • Ho Quee Neo Helen v Lim Pui Heng
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 22 July 1974
    ...in caring for the welfare of the child, even orders for joint custody can be made - see J v C [1970] AC 668 and Jussa v Jussa [1972] 2 All ER 600. It should also be noted, that s 3 and 5 of our Guardianship of Infants Act (Cap 22, 1970 Ed) follow the lines of corresponding provisions in the......
  • Re Carlson
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 2 May 2000
    ...lines 9–23). Cases cited: (1) Dipper v. Dipper, [1981] Fam. 31; [1980] 2 All E.R. 722; (1980), 1 FLR 286, applied. (2) Jussa v. Jussa, [1972] 1 W.L.R. 881; [1972] 2 All E.R. 600; (1972), 116 Sol. Jo. 219, applied. Legislation construed: Guardianship and Custody of Children Law (1996 Revisio......
  • Re G (Guardianship of an Infant)
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 29 October 2003
    ...(R) 894; [2000] 1 SLR 754 (folld) Ho Quee Neo Helen v Lim Pui Heng [1974-1976] SLR (R) 158; [1972-1974] SLR 249 (folld) Jussa v Jussa [1972] 1 WLR 881 (folld) Guardianship of Infants Act (Cap 122, 1985 Rev Ed) s 3 S Magintharan (Netto Tan & S Magin) for the appellant Christopher Gill (Chris......
  • Wqn v Xev
    • Antigua and Barbuda
    • Court of Appeal (Antigua and Barbuda)
    • 4 June 2025
    ...is nothing to cause the Court to set aside the determination made by the learned judge. Caffell v. Caffell [1984] F.L.R. 169 applied; Jussa v. Jussa [1972] 1 W.L.R. 881; Re D Minors [1987] Lexis Citation 1668 applied; Re B (a Minor) [1986] Lexis Citation 539 applied. 4. As it relates to th......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Custody
    • Jamaica
    • Family Law in Jamaica
    • 18 August 2018
    ...not dened in the Act. See UK, Australian, and New Zealand legislation.54. Clissold v Clissold (1964) 108 Sol Jo 220.55. Jussa v Jussa [1972] 2 All ER 600. Custody 271in the best interests of the child.56 From a practical standpoint, the wisdom of this way of resolving the matter depends on......
  • Family Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2004, December 2004
    • 1 December 2004
    ...The courts have often awarded sole custody when parties are acrimonious and uncooperative, relying on the principles in Jussa v Jussa[1972] 1 WLR 881 and Ho Quee Neo Helen v Lim Pui Heng[1972—1974] SLR 249 (‘Ho Quee Neo Helen’). CX v CY challenges this approach. It suggests that when partie......
  • Family Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2003, December 2003
    • 1 December 2003
    ...instead that it was the mother who had tried to keep the child away from him. The district judge relied on the cases of Jussa v Jussa[1972] 2 All ER 600 and Ho Quee Neo Helen v Lim Pui Heng[1972—1974] SLR 249 and held that as the parties had an acrimonious relationship and could not coopera......