Jussa v Jussa

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1972
Year1972
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
40 cases
  • Ho Quee Neo Helen v Lim Pui Heng
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 22 Julio 1974
    ...in caring for the welfare of the child, even orders for joint custody can be made - see J v C [1970] AC 668 and Jussa v Jussa [1972] 2 All ER 600. It should also be noted, that s 3 and 5 of our Guardianship of Infants Act (Cap 22, 1970 Ed) follow the lines of corresponding provisions in the......
  • Re Carlson
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 2 Mayo 2000
    ...defendant. Cases cited: (1) Dipper v. Dipper, [1981] Fam. 31; [1980] 2 All E.R. 722; (1980), 1 FLR 286, applied. (2) Jussa v. Jussa, [1972] 1 W.L.R. 881; [1972] 2 All E.R. 600; (1972), 116 Sol. Jo. 219, applied. Legislation construed: Guardianship and Custody of Children Law (1996 Revision)......
  • Re G (Guardianship of an Infant)
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 29 Octubre 2003
    ...(R) 894; [2000] 1 SLR 754 (folld) Ho Quee Neo Helen v Lim Pui Heng [1974-1976] SLR (R) 158; [1972-1974] SLR 249 (folld) Jussa v Jussa [1972] 1 WLR 881 (folld) Guardianship of Infants Act (Cap 122, 1985 Rev Ed) s 3 S Magintharan (Netto Tan & S Magin) for the appellant Christopher Gill (Chris......
  • Martha Josefina Ramirez Torres Applicant/Petitioner v Pedro Miguel Castellanos Basto Applicant/Respondent [ECSC]
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 3 Abril 2014
    ...2013 15 Paragraph 13 of the Mother's Second Affidavit 16 Affidavit of Terry Small filed on 23rd April 2013 17 (1982) 4 FLR 482, CA 18Jussa v Jussa [1972] 2 All. E.R. 19 Walker v Walker and Harrison per Hardy Boys J 20 [2000] EWCA Civ 3009 [2014] ECSC J0403-2 EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Custody
    • Jamaica
    • Family Law in Jamaica
    • 18 Agosto 2018
    ...not dened in the Act. See UK, Australian, and New Zealand legislation.54. Clissold v Clissold (1964) 108 Sol Jo 220.55. Jussa v Jussa [1972] 2 All ER 600. Custody 271in the best interests of the child.56 From a practical standpoint, the wisdom of this way of resolving the matter depends on......
  • Family Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2004, December 2004
    • 1 Diciembre 2004
    ...The courts have often awarded sole custody when parties are acrimonious and uncooperative, relying on the principles in Jussa v Jussa[1972] 1 WLR 881 and Ho Quee Neo Helen v Lim Pui Heng[1972—1974] SLR 249 (‘Ho Quee Neo Helen’). CX v CY challenges this approach. It suggests that when partie......
  • Family Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2003, December 2003
    • 1 Diciembre 2003
    ...instead that it was the mother who had tried to keep the child away from him. The district judge relied on the cases of Jussa v Jussa[1972] 2 All ER 600 and Ho Quee Neo Helen v Lim Pui Heng[1972—1974] SLR 249 and held that as the parties had an acrimonious relationship and could not coopera......
  • THE NEXT STEP IN POST-DIVORCE PARENTING1
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2005, December 2005
    • 1 Diciembre 2005
    ...at [28]—[29]. 33 Ho Quee Neo Helen v Lim Pui Heng [1972—1974] SLR 249 34 Supra n 11. 35 Id at [6] and [8]. 36 See supra n 8, at [29]. 37 [1972] 1 WLR 881. 38 Supra n 33 (“Ho Quee Neo Helen”). 39 Id at 252, [16]. 40 See Leong Wai Kum, Principles of Family Law in Singapore (Butterworths Asia,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT