K/S Merc-Scandia XXXXII v Lloyd's Underwriters [QBD (Comm)]
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | Aikens J. |
Judgment Date | 23 June 2000 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
Date | 23 June 2000 |
Queen's Bench Division
Before Mr Justice Aikens.
Insurance - insured producing forged letter on matter not affecting liability - insurers cannot avoid liability
The insured's production of a forged letter to underwriters to support their application, on the insured's behalf, to dispute the jurisdiction of the English court, in a claim brought by a third party, was not material constituting a breach of the insured's post-contract duty of utmost good faith.
Therefore, the underwriters were not entitled to avoid an insurance policy and decline to satisfy a third party's claim against the insured for risk covered under the policy for the insured's deliberate misrepresentation when the misrepresentation was not material to affect a valid claim of the third party.
Mr Justice Aikens so held in the Queen's Bench Division when he gave judgment for the plaintiff, K/S Merc-Scandia XXXXII, who sought to recover from the defendants, Lloyd's Underwriters subscribing to Lloyd's Policy No 25T 1954 87, Ocean Marine Insurance Company Ltd and 35 other defendants, money due under a judgment recovered against the defendants' insured.
The defendants had contended that they had avoided the policy for breach of the duty of utmost good faith by the insured's producing a forged letter to help the insurers relating to a jurisdiction application.
Mr Richard Millet for the plaintiff; Mr Andrew Lydiard for the defendants
MR JUSTICE AIKENS said that even if the claim against the assured had remained contested, the fact that the assured had forged the letter would not have influenced the outcome on the issue of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
(1) Nelista Rambally individually and as personally representative of the Estate of Hezekiah Rambally (2) Rudolph Rambally (3) Sieana Rambally Claimants v (1) Barbados Fire and General Insurance Company Ltd (2) Thomas Jean (3) Thomas M. Jean Insurance Brokerage Ltd Defendants [ECSC]
... ... Insurance and also policies issued by Lloyds, any dealings, with the premium by the broker ... relationship between brokers and underwriters and ought to be reconsidered": ( Collinvaux's ... Mr. Calderon cited K/S Merc Scandia-vs-Underwriters of Lloyds (2001) 2 Lloyds Rep ... Royal Exchange Assurance Corporation … [3 QBD. 173] , but can they keep the whole, having lost ... ...
-
K/s Merc-scandia Xxxxii v Certain Lloyd's Underwriters and Others
...of merely culpable. 4 The facts, on which the finding of fraud was based are fully set out in the judgment of Aikens J reported at [2000] 2 Lloyds Rep 357. For present purposes a brief recapitulation is all that is necessary. In September 1990 Mr Nicholas Bourke of Elbornes decided to ask ......
-
Agapitos and another v Agnew and Others
... ... 1 and 2; and K/S Merc-Scandia v. Certain Lloyd's Underwriters (The "Mercandian ... ...
-
Friends Provident Life and Pensions Ltd v Sirius International Insurance
...(The Beursgracht)UNK [2001] EWCA Civ 2051; [2002] CLC 547. K/S Merc-Skandia XXXXII v Lloyd's Underwriters (The Mercandian Continent) [2000] CLC 1425; [2001] CLC 1836 (CA). Phoenix General Insurance Co of Greece SA v Halvanon Insurance Co LtdUNK [1985] 2 Ll Rep 599; [1988] QB 216 (CA). Reid ......
-
The duty of utmost good faith in insurance law: where is it in the 21st century? The historical background of good and bad faith continues to develop in English law, especially in two recent maritime cases.
...1 Lloyd's Rep. at 406 (paras. 73 and 76). (20.) [2001] EWCA CIV 1275 (Court of Appeal, 31 July 2001). (21.) [1997] LRLR 523. (22.) [2000] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 357 (23.) Following Alfred McAlpine plc v. BAI (Run-Off) Ltd., [2000] 1 Lloyds Rep (24.) [2001] EWCA CIV 1275 (Court of Appeal) (31 July 2......