K/S A/S Bill Biakh v Hyundia Corporation

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1987
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
27 cases
  • Goldenlotus Maritime Ltd v European Chartering and Shipping Inc
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 3 d3 Novembro d3 1993
    ... ... In support of his contention, he cited K/S A/S Bill Biakh v Hyundai Corporation ... I do not accept his contention as it is ... ...
  • London Underground Ltd v Citylink Telecommunications Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • Invalid date
    ...that such a challenge is misconceived. See Moran v. Lloyd's [1983] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 472; K/S A/S Bill Biakh v. Hyundai Corporation [1988] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 187. Then an attempt was made to argue that an obvious mistake of fact may amount to an excess of jurisdiction which would enable the Cour......
  • Willie (Charles M.) & Company (Shipping) Ltd v Ocean Laser Shipping Ltd (Smaro)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 29 d4 Outubro d4 1998
    ...South India Shipping Corporation [1981] AC 909. As Mr Justice Steyn put it trenchantly in K/S A/S Bill Biakh v. Hyundai Corporation [1988] 1 Lloyd's Rep 187 at 189: "In an extreme case it is conceivable that an arbitrator's failure to observe the principles of natural justice in the making ......
  • Lesotho Highlands Development Authority v Impregilo SpA
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 30 d4 Junho d4 2005
    ...whether his decision is on a matter of substance or procedure." See also my judgments in K/S A/S Bill Biakh v Hyundai Corporation [1988] 1 Lloyd's Rep 187, 190; Bank Mellat v GAA Development and Construction Co [1988] 2 Lloyd's Rep 44, 26 In order to understand the radical nature of the a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Court Involvement in Commercial Arbitration
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books A Practitioner's Guide to Commercial Arbitration The Middle
    • 24 d6 Junho d6 2017
    ...to the ability of our system of arbitration to serve the needs of users of the arbitral process”: K/S A/S Biakh v. Hyundai Corp. , [1988] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 187 (Q.B. Com. Ct.) at p. 189, Steyn J. 58 Similarly, in the Quebec case of Endorecherche inc c Université Laval , the moving party challe......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT