K v Hillingdon
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Neutral Citation | [2011] UKUT 71 (AAC) |
| Date | 2011 |
| Year | 2011 |
| Court | Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
CM HS 169 2011
...3(3) and is not restricted to the resources of the placing local authority: O v Lewisham [2007] EWHC 2130 and K v LB Hillingdon [2011] UKUT 71 (AAC); [2011] AACR 31 followed (paragraphs 37, 48 and Lord Slynn’s remarks in Harrow are to be taken as a recognition that, in the light of the weak......
-
London Borough of Croydon v K-A (SEN)
...wider range of potential benefits to J, in terms of educational, social care and healthcare benefits” (citing K v Hillingdon LBC (SEN) [2011] UKUT 71 (AAC) at paragraph 29). 3 London Borough of Croydon v K.-A. [2022] UKUT 106 (AAC) Case no: UA-2021-001986-HS 9. The Tribunal went on to dismi......
-
Wendy Haining v Warrington Borough Council
...9 included expenditure by public bodies other than the LEA. The same conclusion was reached by other tribunals such as in K v London Borough of Hillingdon [2011] UKUT 71 (AAC) (HH Judge Pearl) and FS (Re T) v London Borough of Bromley [2013] UKUT 529 (AAC) (UT Judge Levenson). Decision of U......
-
Haining v Warrington Borough Council HS 1444 2013
...64 The Lewisham decision was cited in detail and supported by the decision of HHJ Pearl sitting in this Chamber in SK v Hillingdon LBC [2011] UKUT 71 (AAC), [2011] ELR 165, which was also cited to me. I note that Oxfordshire v GB was referred to by the First-tier Tribunal in that case also ......
Request a trial to view additional results