K v K (Abduction) (No 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Family Division |
| Neutral Citation | [2009] EWHC 3378 (Fam) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Date | 2009 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
(1) Vauxhall Motors Ltd v (2) Opel Automobile GmbH
...final judgment, or between handing down the final judgment and sealing the order giving effect to the judgment: see e.g. K v K (Abduction) (No. 2) [2009] EWHC 3378 (Fam), Tetronics (International) v HSBC Bank [2018] EWHC 201 (TCC), and Augusti v Matharu [2023] EWHC 1900 139 The three criter......
-
Vauxhall Motors Ltd & Ors v Denso Automotive UK Ltd & Ors
...final judgment, or between handing down the final judgment and sealing the order giving effect to the judgment: see e.g. K v K (Abduction) (No. 2) [2009] EWHC 3378 (Fam), Tetronics (International) v HSBC Bank [2018] EWHC 201 (TCC), and Augusti v Matharu [2023] EWHC 1900 139. The three crite......
-
Vauxhall Motors Ltd & Ors v Denso Automotive UK Ltd & Ors
...or between handing down the final judgment and sealing the order giving effect to the judgment: see e.g. K v K (Abduction) (No. 2) [2009] EWHC 3378 (Fam), Tetronics (International) v HSBC Bank [2018] EWHC 201 (TCC), and Augusti v Matharu [2023] EWHC 1900 139. The three criteria in Ladd v Ma......
-
Attorney General Plaintiff v Martin Bridger Defendant
...before me is one made before judgment has been given, Mr. Murphy also drew to the Court's attention the case ofK v K (Abduction) (No 2) [2009] EWHC 3378. In that case an administrative error, which resulted in a judgment in Hague Convention proceedings being handed down in ignorance of an a......
Get Started for Free