K. v P. (J., Third Party)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Judgment Date | 1992 |
| Date | 1992 |
| Year | 1992 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
24 cases
-
Dubai Aluminium Company Ltd v Salaam
...he is left with a large undisgorged balance whereas the other is out of pocket. 54 Rix J considered this was obvious. So did Ferris J, in K v P [1993] Ch 140, 149. I agree with them. The contribution claims: overall assessment 55 Mr Salaam was the largest beneficiary of the scheme, keeping......
-
Defender Ltd v HSBC France (1), Defender Ltd v HSBC France (2)
...to make contribution to the primary wrongdoer if that wrongdoer had satisfied the plaintiff's claim. 107 In K. & Anor. v. P. & Ors. [1993] Ch. 140 (“ K. v. P.”), the plaintiffs brought proceedings against the defendants for conspiracy to defraud by obtaining inflated fees by commission pay......
-
Friends' Provident Life Office (A Firm) v Hillier Parker May & Rowden; Estates & General Plc and Others, third parties
... ... , Hillier Parker May & Rowden ("Hillier Parker") from an order of His Honour Judge Havery, QC on 7th February 1994 striking out its third party claims against the First and Second Third Parties, Estates & General PLC and Castle Mall Securities Limited ("the Developers") as disclosing no ... See Re Hatch [1919] 1 Ch 351 ; Ord v. Ord [1923] 2 KB 432, per Lush J. 445–6 ... But here, the pleaded allegation was one of mistake of fact. Although the Developers' application to strike it out included the grounds ... ...
-
Niru Battery Manufacturing Company v Milestone Trading Ltd (No 2)
... ... appeal which this constitution of the Court of Appeal has heard from decisions of Moore-B ick J in this action. In the first appeal, in judgments delivered on 23 October 2003, reference [2003] ... Sepah"), and was given jointly and severally against Mr Mahdavi, CAI and SGS, who were the third, fourth and fifth defendants respectively ... 2 As indicated in ... CAI has been relieved of liability at the expense of SGS and as a party liable to make restitution on the grounds of unjust enrichment I do not think that in relation to ... ...
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Restitution
...perturbed by the claim by one alleged wrongdoer to claim contribution from another, the judge was persuaded by the arguments in K v P[1993] Ch 140, dealing with the then English provision which was in pari materia with the provision under consideration, that Parliament had intended to overr......
