K. v P. (J., Third Party)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1992 |
| Year | 1992 |
| Date | 1992 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
23 cases
-
Dubai Aluminium Company Ltd v Salaam
...he is left with a large undisgorged balance whereas the other is out of pocket. 54 Rix J considered this was obvious. So did Ferris J, in K v P [1993] Ch 140, 149. I agree with them. The contribution claims: overall assessment 55 Mr Salaam was the largest beneficiary of the scheme, keeping......
-
Defender Ltd v HSBC France (1), Defender Ltd v HSBC France (2)
...to make contribution to the primary wrongdoer if that wrongdoer had satisfied the plaintiff's claim. 107 In K. & Anor. v. P. & Ors. [1993] Ch. 140 (“ K. v. P.”), the plaintiffs brought proceedings against the defendants for conspiracy to defraud by obtaining inflated fees by commission pay......
-
Niru Battery Manufacturing Company v Milestone Trading Ltd (No 2)
... ... appeal which this constitution of the Court of Appeal has heard from decisions of Moore-B ick J in this action. In the first appeal, in judgments delivered on 23 October 2003, reference [2003] ... Sepah"), and was given jointly and severally against Mr Mahdavi, CAI and SGS, who were the third, fourth and fifth defendants respectively ... 2 As indicated in ... CAI has been relieved of liability at the expense of SGS and as a party liable to make restitution on the grounds of unjust enrichment I do not think that in relation to ... ...
-
Friends' Provident Life Office (A Firm) v Hillier Parker May & Rowden; Estates & General Plc and Others, third parties
... ... , Hillier Parker May & Rowden ("Hillier Parker") from an order of His Honour Judge Havery, QC on 7th February 1994 striking out its third party claims against the First and Second Third Parties, Estates & General PLC and Castle Mall Securities Limited ("the Developers") as disclosing no ... See Re Hatch [1919] 1 Ch 351 ; Ord v. Ord [1923] 2 KB 432, per Lush J. 445–6 ... But here, the pleaded allegation was one of mistake of fact. Although the Developers' application to strike it out included the grounds ... ...
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Restitution
...perturbed by the claim by one alleged wrongdoer to claim contribution from another, the judge was persuaded by the arguments in K v P[1993] Ch 140, dealing with the then English provision which was in pari materia with the provision under consideration, that Parliament had intended to overr......