Kapur v Kapur
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1984 |
| Year | 1984 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
-
Nessa v Chief Adjudication Officer
...features mentioned by Viscount Sumner in Lysaght's case, namely residence adopted voluntarily and for settled purposes." 19 See also Kapur v. Kapur [1984] F.L.R. 920 and V. v. B. (A Minor) (Abduction) [1991] 1 F.L.R. 177, where the two words were regarded as almost meaning the same thing. 2......
-
Nessa v Chief Adjudication Officer
...case, where the regulations require there to be habitual residence on the day when the claim for income support is made. 17 Kapur v Kapur [1984] FLR 920 was another case where a period of residence was required to establish jurisdiction, although it now had to be habitual residence. The con......
-
B v H (Children) (Habitual Residence)
...J) (minor: abduction: illegitimate child) [1990] 2 All ER 961, sub nom C v S (a minor) (abduction) [1990] 2 FLR 442, HL. Kapur v Kapur [1984] FLR 920. KM (a minor) (habitual residence), Re[1996] 2 FCR 333; sub nom Re M (abduction: habitual residence) [1996] 1 FLR 887, KR (abduction: forcibl......
-
Nessa v. Chief Adjudication Officer and Anor. CIS 2326 1995
...cases prior to Re J as showing that there was no sensible distinction between ordinary residence and habitual residence. In Kapur v Kapur [1984] FLR 920 (Bush J) and V v B (A Minor) (Abduction) [1991] 1 FLR 266 (Sir Stephen Brown P) that was said expressly. In Shah, the word “habitually” wa......
Request a trial to view additional results