Kates v Jeffery
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1914 |
| Date | 1914 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 cases
-
Corey Dixon v Crown Prosecution Service
...had to establish in order to justify the appellant's conviction. In principle and as confirmed by the case of Kates v Jeffery [1914] 3 KB 160, the correct approach in our view is this. If this court were to conclude that, on the facts found by the Crown Court and stated in the case, the Cro......
-
London County Council v Farren
...Tenant Act 1954 is undoubtedly a pure question of law, if taken by itself. Accordingly, within such decisions as ( Kates v. Jeffery 1914 (3) K.B. p. 160) and ( Knight v. Halliwell Law Reports vol. IX, Queen's Bench, p. 412) to which we were referred, it was open, although the matter had not......
-
Evans Medical Supplies Ltd v Moriarty
...and this applies equally to a Case stated under a Statute worded like Section 64 (6) of the Income Tax Act, 1952: see Kates v. Jeffery, [1914] 3 K.B. 160; London County Council v. Farren, [1956] 1 W.L.R. 1297. I turn, therefore, to consider the entire sum of £100,000. It was payable to Evan......
-
London Borough of Hackney v Messrs A. Mott and D. Fairman
...However, it is an important question of law which no further evidence in the case could alter. This court can, therefore, answer it (see Kates v. Jeffery [1914] 3 KB 160 DC). 15 I am much indebted to Mr. Humphries, who appeared on behalf of the Council, for his helpful guidance on the relev......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Assaulting a Police Officer: The Redundant Perils of Establishing ‘In the Execution of His Duty’?: Dixon v Crown Prosecution Service [2018] EWHC 3154 (Admin)
...10.1177/0022018319831089journals.sagepub.com/home/clj accordance with principle, as reflected by the decision in Kates v Jeffrey [1914] 3 KB 160, the DivisionalCourt decided to entertain the appeal. In its judgment, if it were to conclude, contrary to the Crown Courtfinding, that the third ......