Kaye v Sutherland
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1887 |
| Year | 1887 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
- K Annamalai; The National Union of Plantation Workers
-
The Clare County Council v William Wilson, David Wilson, and Adam Wilson, Trading as Adam Wilson and Sons
...[1892] 2 Q. B. 515. (3) [1893] 2 Q. B. 333, at p. 341. (4) [1894] 1 Q. B. 37. (5) [1910] 2 I. R. 666. (6) 7 A. C. 694, at p. 707. (1) 20 Q. B. D. 147. (1) [1892] 2 Q. B. 515. (2) [1907] 1 K. B. 219, at p. 230. (3) 2 C. P. D. 24. (4) 14 Q. B. D. 78. (5) [1894] 1 I. R. 185, at p. 203. (1) [18......
-
Sibisi v Trustees under Natal Act No 9 1910
...intended to convey different meanings: Maxwell, p. 449. The meaning of "affected" is clear: Imperial Dictionary; Kaye v Sutherland (L.R. 20 Q.B.D. 147). F. S. Tatham, K.C. (with him C. A. Beck), for the respondents: The sole question is as to the meaning of the expression "affected by this ......
- Carlingford Lough Harbour Improvement Commissioners v FJ Everard and Sons Ltd
Request a trial to view additional results