Kelly (orse Hyams) v Kelly (1932)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1932 |
| Year | 1932 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Hudson v Leigh (Note) [Family Division]
... ... , Neuman v Neuman The Times 15th October 1926 and Kelly v Kelly The Times Law Reports 16th December 1932 as ... ...
-
Nadeem Shahzad v Nusrat Mazher
...9 above, marriage creates an important status, a status “of very great consequence”, per Lord Merrivale P in Kelly (orse. Hyams) v Kelly (1932) 49 TLR 99, at p. 101. Its importance as a matter of law derives from the significant legal rights and obligations it creates. It engages both the p......
-
The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Nasim Akhtar
...9 above, marriage creates an important status, a status “of very great consequence”, per Lord Merrivale P in Kelly (orse Hyams) v Kelly (1932) 49 TLR 99, 101. Its importance as a matter of law derives from the significant legal rights and obligations it creates. It engages both the private ......
-
J v S-T (Formerly J) (Transsexual: Ancillary Relief)
...received the endorsement of the House of Lords was that which had been expressed by Lord Merrivale P. in Kelly (orse. Hyams) v Kelly [1932] 49 T.L.R. 99, 101 in these terms:— "In a country like ours, where the marriage status is of very great consequence and where the enforcement of the mar......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Marriage
...356 at 359. 58 Moss v. Moss , [1897] P. 263. 59 Ford v. Stier , [1896] P. 1; Valier v. Valier (1925), 133 L.R. 830; Kelly v. Kelly (1932), 49 T.L.R. 99; Mehta v. Mehta , [1945] 2 All E.R. 690; Vamvakidis v. Kirkoff , [1930] 2 D.L.R. 877 (Ont. C.A.); Nane (Sykiotis) v. Sykiotis (1966), 57 D......
-
Marriage
...N.Z.L.R.356at359. 58 Moss v. Moss ,[1897]P.263. 59 Ford v. Stier ,[1896]P.1; Valier v. Valier (1925), 133 L.R. 830; Kellyv.Kelly (1932), 49 T.L.R. 99; Mehtav.Mehta ,[1945]2 AllE.R.690; Vamvakidis v. Kirkoff ,[1930]2 D.L.R. 877 (Ont. C.A.); Nane (Sykiotis) v. Sykiotis (1966), 57 D.L.R. (2d)......