Kendall v Kendall
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1977 |
| Date | 1977 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Golubovich v Golubovich and Another (No 2)
...permits consideration of an unrestricted range of factors and circumstances: see Chaudhary v Chaudhary [1985] Fam 19; Kendall v Kendall [1977] Fam 208 and S-T (formerly J) v J [1998] Fam 103. A Hemain injunction is a holding order made on an interim basis to restrain a party from taking any......
-
H v H (Queen's Proctor intervening) (validity of Japanese divorce)
...of the divorce. In the circumstances there was no basis for refusing recognition on the ground of public policy; Kendall v Kendall [1977] 3 All ER 471 and Eroglu v Eroglu [1994] FCR 525 applied. Accordingly, the petition would be dismissed. Cases referred to in judgmentAbbassi v Abbassi[200......
-
Np v Krp
...offends against substantial justice. I accept that the test must be narrowly interpreted and stringently applied. Both parties rely on Kendall and Kendall 1977 Fam 208. The divorce had been obtained by fraud: W's case was that she had been inveigled into signing documents on the pretext th......
-
Wheeler v Wheeler
...CILR 189, dicta of Collett, C.J. applied. (8) Joyce v. Joyce, [1979] Fam. 93; [1979] 2 All E.R. 156, followed. (9) Kendall v. Kendall, [1977] Fam. 208; [1977] 3 All E.R. 471, considered. (10) Kilderkin Invs. v. Player, 1984-85 CILR 63, distinguished. (11) Levett v. Levett, [1957] P. 156; [1......
Request a trial to view additional results