Kennedy v Lyell
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1882 |
Year | 1882 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
20 cases
-
Miley v Flood (no 1)
...V GALINSKI 1970 QB 38 PARKHURST V LOUGHTON 1818 CH 2 SWAN 194 CATHCART, IN RE EX-PARTE CAMPDELL 1870 LR5 CH APP 703 LYELL V KENNEDY 23 CHD 387 INTERNATIONAL CREDIT & INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD V ADHAM TLR 10.2.1997 MORRICK "PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE: THE CLIENT'S IDENTITY" 1980 124 SOL J 303 CONO......
- Asic v Mining Projects Group Ltd
-
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Mining Projects Group Limited
...Qd R 141 J-Corp Pty Ltd v Australian Builders Labourers Federated Union of Workers (WA Branch) (No 1) (1992) 38 FCR 452 Kennedy v Lyell (1883) 23 Ch D 387 Lee v Read (1842) 5 Beav 381 [49 ER 625] Mayor of Derby County Borough v Derbyshire County Council [1897] AC 550 Mitsubishi Electric Aus......
- Hartogen Energy Ltd (in Liquidation) v the Australian Gas Light Company
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
NEW TWISTS IN LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE: COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF LITIGATION AND BETWEEN THE LAWYER AND CLIENT
...Ltd & Anor [1998] 2 SLR 657, at paras 6—7 (citing Lord Edmund-Davies’s judgment in Waugh at 543). 22 See, for example Kennedy v Lyell(1883) 23 Ch D 387, at 404; In Anderson v Bank of British Columbia(1876) 2 Ch D 644, at 656—7 (James LJ), 658—659 (Mellish LJ); Kyshe v Holt[1888] WN 128 (Smi......